You knew someone would ‘bring this up’ yet you still decided to promote a falsehood? Sheesh!tranquility922 wrote: ↑Dec 23rd, 2017 11:04 pmKnew someone would bring this up. Anyway, not necessarily, if they don't want to be obvious and want to set forth an agenda, they obviously wouldn't use direct channels. Anyway, isn't there supposed to be some professional courtesy not trying to interfere/muddle the investigation, esp so early on? Just too weird.
In any event, referring to your latest bizzarre statement , how is an ex-cop is ‘interfering’ with an investigation just because he gives his opinion to a newspaper?
Your view sure is a wild characterization of what is happening.