PDA

View Full Version : A Good Thing: Rob Ford/Minnan-Wong Expands Toronto Bike Network



flashy_mcflash
Apr 25th, 2012, 11:34 AM
I know I rail against Ford a lot, but here's something he's actually doing right (http://www.thestar.com/news/transportation/article/1167341--toronto-moving-to-expand-bike-trails). A cohesive, separated-lane bike network will encourage cycling, promote fitness, and take some congestion off the roads. I have to say I'm pleasantly surprised by this. Good job, Rob and Denzil.


Construction on Toronto’s first physically separated bike lane is scheduled to begin on Sherbourne St. this summer. This spring, Toronto cyclists are enjoying about 30 kilometres of new off-road bike trails and there are plans to build a further 77 kilometres over the next decade.

But the councillor in charge of Toronto’s cycling plans knows he will still take heat: over not enough cycling infrastructure; over plans to remove painted lanes on Jarvis; over where new bike lanes are created.

“No matter what you build you will have enthusiastic supporters and critics,” said Denzil Minnan-Wong, chair of Toronto’s public works and infrastructure committee.

On Tuesday he went to the Ontario Bike Summit to tout what Minnan-Wong says is an aggressive program of expanded, safer and better-connected bike lanes and off-road trails.

Mayor Rob Ford may be branded anti-bike and anti-transit, but the current administration is achieving more cycling improvements than that of former Mayor David Miller, who had a green reputation, said Minnan-wong.

“We’ve been talking a good game but we haven’t been able to do it,” he said, noting that Vancouver, New York and Montreal all have extensive networks of physically separated bike lanes.

“It’s time for us to catch up. We want to get things done. That is why this administration is spending twice as much -- $43 million in five years – on cycling infrastructure than the former administration spent in four -- $21 million,” he said.

Toronto’s bike plan has been expanded from 166 kilometres to 460 km. in 10 years. The city has $90 million for cycling infrastructure in its 10-year capital budget. That includes $6 million a year to build those 77 kilometres of off-road trails.

In addition to physically separating cyclists from traffic on Sherbourne St. for 4 kilometres between Bloor and Front streets, Toronto is embarking on studies and consultations this year to build separated cycling lanes on Wellesley St., and the Richmond or Adelaide corridor.

Those streets have been in the bike plan for 10 years, but this is the first real progress, said Minnan-Wong.

But, he said, the plan is built on the philosophy that bikes should not impede cars.

“There are streets in this city that best serve motorists where bike lanes are not appropriate,” he said, using Jarvis as an example. Probably the most controversial bike lanes in the city were built in 2010 but will be removed this summer when the Sherbourne lane separation is complete.

Ridership is higher in the downtown core, but the greatest growth in cycling in Toronto is in the suburbs, said Daniel Egan, manager of Pedestrian and Cycling Infrastructure.

Fifty-eight per cent of Ontario residents would like to bike more, up from 53 per cent a year ago, according to an annual survey by the Share the Road Cycling Coalition, which organized the bike summit.

“Toronto’s doing some really good stuff but they have a long way to go,” said coalition founder Eleanor McMahon.

She says big city lifestyles have polarized the discussion of cycling in Toronto.

“The pressure of daily lives is so heightened here,” she said. “But even if you never ride a bike, cycling is good for you because it means less cars on the road.

Copenhagen commutes on two wheels

In the commuter cycling world, Andreas Rohl is a rock star.

"We have no cyclists in Copenhagen. We just have citizens who use their bikes to go from A to B," the manager of Copenhagen's bike program told a rapt audience of bike planners and advocates at the Ontario Bike Summit in Toronto Tuesday.

In a city of 1.5 million people, more people bike to work or school than drive: 37 per cent compared with 31 per cent who travel by car. The rest take transit or walk.

But that's not good enough for the free-wheeling Danes, who want to drive the number of cycling commuters to 50 per cent in the near future.

Despite a climate similar to Toronto's, 32 per cent of all trips are made by bike and 70 per cent of residents ride at least once a week.

About a quarter of families with two or more kids own cargo bikes, which require an investment of about $3,000 Cdn.

Car ownership has nevertheless increased by about 50 per cent in recent years.

"We like people to have access to cars when they need them," Rohl said.

Copenhagen, he said, invests $15 million to $20 million annually (about $25 per citizen) in biking infrastructure, including bridges and elevated bikeways that allow for passage over busy streets and make biking speeds competitive with the car. It also pays for small comforts along bike lanes, such as angled trash cans and footrests at stoplights.

An extension of the Rail Path would also be welcome, but I'm sure that will come in time.

Dina_E
Apr 25th, 2012, 12:13 PM
The bicycle union and lefties are against safe bike lanes.

They want bike lanes on major arteries such as yonge and university because it's not about biking safety ita about being your in your face.

manmanny
Apr 25th, 2012, 12:17 PM
The bicycle union and lefties are against safe bike lanes.



Why people are against safe bike lanes?

telman
Apr 25th, 2012, 12:18 PM
Why is my spider sense tingling???

Hitman21
Apr 25th, 2012, 12:20 PM
The bicycle union and lefties are against safe bike lanes.

They want bike lanes on major arteries such as yonge and university because it's not about biking safety ita about being your in your face.

Agreed. They just want to stop cars and its why they continue with the War On The Car

flashy_mcflash
Apr 25th, 2012, 12:24 PM
They want bike lanes on major arteries such as yonge and university because it's not about biking safety ita about being your in your face.

Wow, Dina_E with what is almost a complete English sentence. No wonder you guys want cutbacks to teachers if the education system is producing quality opinions and language skills like these.

BTW, I'm a lefty cyclist and I support these lanes, hence, you know, this thread. OH NO! LOGIC BOMB!

r1lee
Apr 25th, 2012, 12:34 PM
Rob Ford wants what's best for the city. He's never been inclined to remove bikes in general. It has to be done smartly and efficiently, throwing up bike lanes in the middle of a main artery is absurd, everyone knows this. But Miller did it just so he can say he did it.

I'm one for spending money on area's that benefit all. You can't just spend spend spend spend. Cut backs in certain area's can fund projects like this.

I just hope they don't do that stupid toll driving into Toronto. Build another toll highway if that's what they want.

gizmo8
Apr 25th, 2012, 12:42 PM
The worst crap the lefties did is put thousands of speed bumps everywhere...I understand put them near senior homes and schools but not on every damn street.Lefties cries when Ford tries to cut non essential programs and want him to raise taxes to support their pet projects but trying to take a lane out of a busy street for bikers is insane....

BornRuff
Apr 25th, 2012, 12:43 PM
I know I rail against Ford a lot, but here's something he's actually doing right (http://www.thestar.com/news/transportation/article/1167341--toronto-moving-to-expand-bike-trails). A cohesive, separated-lane bike network will encourage cycling, promote fitness, and take some congestion off the roads. I have to say I'm pleasantly surprised by this. Good job, Rob and Denzil.



An extension of the Rail Path would also be welcome, but I'm sure that will come in time.

This is mostly just spin.

The 30k of off road bike trails, and 77k to come, were just projects that were already part of the capital plan before Ford took office.

Ford has removed more kilometers of bike lanes on roads than he is building.

Kohanz
Apr 25th, 2012, 12:51 PM
Why is this a lefty/righty thing? Do only lefties ride bicycles?!

flashy_mcflash
Apr 25th, 2012, 12:54 PM
This is mostly just spin.

The 30k of off road bike trails, and 77k to come, were just projects that were already part of the capital plan before Ford took office.

Ford has removed more kilometers of bike lanes on roads than he is building.

If he actually gets a separated lane down Sherbourne and across Richmond, I'll give him this win. He gets so very few of them these days ;)

BornRuff
Apr 25th, 2012, 03:50 PM
If he actually gets a separated lane down Sherbourne and across Richmond, I'll give him this win. He gets so very few of them these days ;)

Here is a list of the bikeway projects in the city over the last few years.

http://www.toronto.ca/cycling/network/pdf/networking_tracking.pdf

While they did get a ton of new off road bike trails built, the sum of all of their on road bike projects was a net loss of 3.2 kms of bikeways.

Separated bike lanes are great, but there is no chance that we can put all of our eggs in that basket. It is great that you can bike safely down Sherborne soon, and possibly across one of the downtown streets in a few years, but people will still need to get off of those main routes and bike to their final destination. The existing kinds of bike lanes that are just painted on are still a huge improvement over not having bike lanes at all, and we should be continuing to install them on routes not slated for separated bike lanes.

Last year they only undertook one project to install bike lanes. I think the old strategy of designing bike lanes into pretty much all road refurbishment projects should be continued.

Bike paths in hydo corridors in the burbs really should be treated as a completely separate issue. They are great for recreational riders, but they do very little for those who want to use their bikes as their main form of transportation.

stealth
Apr 25th, 2012, 07:24 PM
Why is this a lefty/righty thing? Do only lefties ride bicycles?!

Theyre the only ones that think bicyclces can replace cars in a Canadian climate with urban sprawl ;)

BornRuff
Apr 25th, 2012, 07:45 PM
Theyre the only ones that think bicyclces can replace cars in a Canadian climate with urban sprawl ;)

For those living near the core, it is very practical. Many people use bikes to get around, some as their primary form of transportation.

As long as bikes are allowed on roads, we should continue to make roads better able to deal with that reality. It is bad for drivers and cyclists to have them trying to share the same lanes.

Kohanz
Apr 25th, 2012, 07:55 PM
Theyre the only ones that think bicyclces can replace cars in a Canadian climate with urban sprawl ;)

I do have to say, having moved to Vancouver from Ontario, the level of bike accessibility here is great. There are lots of designed biking routes where you don't have to worry about cars and vice-versa. Obviously both vehicles have their place, but I think most Canadian cities are woefully lacking infrastructure for making cycling safe and accessible.