View Full Version : n/a
hello2006
May 29th, 2009, 06:40 PM
n/a
Seiphas
May 29th, 2009, 08:10 PM
Nope. If you shrink the size, you lose quality. End of story.
Zero1
May 29th, 2009, 11:35 PM
What output is that?
Seiphas
May 29th, 2009, 11:36 PM
MeGUI is used in conjunction with x264 by most people on the internet.
Seiphas
May 29th, 2009, 11:37 PM
What output is that?
Likely a camera shooting AVCHD, .MTS / MPEG-4. I deal with this all the time, and the cameras shoot 18 minutes of video for every 2 gigs of space, when running at 1920x1080p24.
Zero1
May 30th, 2009, 12:32 AM
From my past experience, Mpeg 2 provides both smaller compression and decent image quality.
Seiphas
May 30th, 2009, 12:48 AM
MPEG2 is neither efficient nor decent. MPEG4 is a revision of it, and it was revised for the sole purpose of creating a more efficient and better standard.
And no, there is no magic way to improve the quality of anything. This applies to everything with computers (audio, video, photos). The only exception to this is anything done with film, as film is infinite in quality.