Is wireless G really 54 Mbps?
54 Mbps / 8 = 6.75 MBps, which is kinda slow if I want to transfer an 8 GB 1080p movie across a network. Is 54 Mpbs reality or theoretical (which means it will be even slower)? How about wireless N?
enon
Mar 18th, 2010 9:52 pm
Mar 18th, 2010 10:03 pm
Mar 18th, 2010 10:12 pm
Mar 19th, 2010 10:45 am
Mar 19th, 2010 11:43 am
Mar 19th, 2010 12:05 pm
Neither. Get a dedicated G or N router and run bridge mode instead. It costs more but you get faster connecting time (since the connection is always up), stronger and more stable signals.
Mar 19th, 2010 2:07 pm
Or string RJ-45. On my dir-655, with the Wireless N NIC across the room at 15 feet, my real time data throughput peaked at 78Mbps on multiple testing using iperf. With the cat5e, it was 742Mbps. (gig port) on a shorter run, it was 940Mbps.torseller07 wrote: ↑Neither. Get a dedicated G or N router and run bridge mode instead. It costs more but you get faster connecting time (since the connection is always up), stronger and more stable signals.
Mar 19th, 2010 3:37 pm
Can you go into more details?torseller07 wrote: ↑Neither. Get a dedicated G or N router and run bridge mode instead. It costs more but you get faster connecting time (since the connection is always up), stronger and more stable signals.
There is currently 1 user viewing this thread. (0 members and 1 guest)