That’s the issue. We haven’t seen the pictures, we weren’t there, etc. All we have to offer advice on is what you’ve said. And from what you said, the ticket shows you were doing 30 km/h approaching the intersection with a red light.DerekC129244 wrote: ↑ How can you say that you're 'convinced' when you haven't even seen the photo? You have no idea what you are talking about unless you have magic psychic abilities that defy reality.
You’re free to take it to trial and try to fight it. But your odds of winning are slim, because the only “proof” you have is your statement. The prosecution has a picture taken by government approved technology.
The one plus is that this won’t affect your insurance when you lose. So the only cost is your fine.
Btw, I’m not saying you’re guilty or not. I’m just saying you’re going to be in for a tough case trying to disprove the evidence.
C