I have the Canon Powershot SD400. It's great little camera. It has everything, photo stitch, colour enhance, color swap, decent video capability (I’d say it drains the battery faster when you do video) I was able to go few days without re-charging the battery and that was with taking 50+ pics per day
-
Mar 10th, 2006 12:49 PM #1
Best Ultra-Compact Camera?
I'm planning on backpacking for a couple years and need a camera to bring along with me that is very small and very durable/reliable.
From my online research, I have narrowed my choices down to these:
Canon Powershot SD30
Casio Exilim EX-S500
Nikon Coolpix S3
Konica Minolta DiMAGE X1
Canon Powershot SD400
Can anyone tell me which ones I should consider from these, as in the best bang for the buck?
I will be using the camera for all types of photos (Night, Close-Up, Scenic, etc..) and I want something with a decent movie mode.
I will be travelling all over and size is an issue, so I don't want any camera with a docking station, or short battery life, etc...
Thanks,
Marco
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked newt_101 for this post.
-
Sponsored Links - Join the RedFlagDeals.com community and remove this ad.
-
Mar 10th, 2006 01:17 PM #2Newbie
- Join Date
- Mar 8th, 2006
- Posts
- 19
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked bsds for this post.
-
Mar 10th, 2006 02:13 PM #3
I like my SD300, compact easy to use, though flash is a tad too strong, focusing is a problem at max range, but great little camera
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked TenzoR for this post.
-
Mar 10th, 2006 03:28 PM #4
Ditto on the SD300. Video mode is great. I don't need my Handycam. Get a 2G SD card though for more video time.
_______________
<This space for rent>
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked Mr Nobody for this post.
-
Mar 10th, 2006 03:30 PM #5
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked hagbard for this post.
-
Mar 10th, 2006 03:44 PM #6I'm hurt..........
Originally Posted by hagbard
..........
Please post reason._______________
<This space for rent>
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked Mr Nobody for this post.
-
Mar 10th, 2006 03:48 PM #7
the sony DSC-T# series got good reviews as well
those are more compact than canons i believe_______________
Lenovo SL400 | Core 2 Duo T9400 | Mushkin 4GB PC2-5300
Phenom II X6 1055T @ 3.5GHz| Asus M4A89GTD PRO/USB3 | 6TB FlexRAID | Dell 2405FPW | flickr
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked ShadowVlican for this post.
-
Mar 11th, 2006 07:20 AM #8If you're going to get the SD400, you may want to consider the SD450 as it has a bigger 2.5" lcd screen.
Originally Posted by newt_101
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked chicken_little for this post.
-
Mar 11th, 2006 07:44 AM #9Jr. Member

- Join Date
- Mar 2nd, 2005
- Location
- GTA
- Posts
- 123
I think a lot of people would take issue with this statement. Canon is known to be one of the better brands for digital cameras.
Originally Posted by hagbard
Check out http://www.dpreview.com/ - it reviews almost every camera from every manufacturer.
Personally, I've had 4 Canon digital cameras and have loved three of them. (10D, 20D, A-95). I didn't like my S-40 because it seemed to have a short-focus problem.
I used a Canon - PowerShot A620 a few weeks ago and loved it. It was easy to use and the resulting images were sharp with very little visible chromatic abberation.
Someting you might want to consider is power source. Many of the Canon cameras (A series) use regular AA's. This makes it very convenient when you're travelling and don't always have access to AC for charging batteries.
BTW, right now on Dell.ca, they have many digital cameras on sale for 20% off. (including the A620, SD-450 + SD-400)
J.
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked jamied for this post.
-
Mar 11th, 2006 07:44 AM #10he is sad/mad cuz canon lost or did something bad to his L lens so he now tells ppl to stay away from canon
Originally Posted by Mr Nobody
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked TenzoR for this post.
-
Mar 11th, 2006 07:57 AM #11Newbie
- Join Date
- Nov 9th, 2004
- Location
- Mississauga
- Posts
- 67
Canon uber alles.
My sister has a Canon Elph SD200 and it's very durable, reliable, and takes amazing photos.
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked Ferrari for this post.
-
Mar 11th, 2006 09:31 AM #12
A side by side review of the specs:
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/comp...dsct9&show=all
Movie mode: pick the one that has higher fps (frames/sec). eg. 30 fps
Also, Canon's save movies in AVI format, Sony's save in MPEG format. Pick the one you want.
Battery: all small cameras like these are about the same, since its so small. So just buy a 2nd and 3rd.
Casio: best specs for the buck, BUT, its photos are more flat and quality I found was lower. I've compared between my friend's Casio's with my Sony's. (same shot, etc). Macro and night shots are excellent.
Konica: I'd avoid them, because they are soon going to be bankrupt or bought out. So customer service or repairs will be a problem in the future
Sony: the newest T series are great. Avoid the Old T series, T1, T3, T5, etc. 2.5" LCD screens, 30fps movies
Canon: very popular, lots of ppl use them. I just don't like their AVI movie mode and some models lack the 3:2 ratio shooting mode (4x6 print size)
Most of all, go and try them out. Turn OFF the flash, and try taking a photo. See if they are blurry.
Oh yes, the newer compact cameras have ANTI-SHAKE. Sony T9, etc. Went to Hong Kong in January, and ALL of their compact cameras have anti-shake. So we should see them here soon i hope.
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked rfdrfd for this post.
-
Mar 11th, 2006 09:36 AM #13Care elaborate a bit more? Thanks.
Originally Posted by rfdrfd
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked teknoluv for this post.
-
Mar 11th, 2006 12:59 PM #14
Panasonic FX-9 Lumix ...Big LCD, good battery life and very compact and it has anti shake. AND it comes in 4 different colours =)
Last edited by Anessa; Mar 11th, 2006 at 01:13 PM.
_______________
In Every Heart Red Strength, Our Hearts Are Many, Our Strength Your Envy
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked Anessa for this post.
-
Mar 11th, 2006 01:07 PM #15good summary
Originally Posted by rfdrfd
however it's not fair to take pics without flash... sony (as you stated) does have working anti-shake (to a degree) and so it gives them a great advantage
sony T9 is available here in markham... i can walk over the pacific mall and grab one right NOW.
MJPEG or MPEG..... i'd like mpeg4 if they do that...._______________
Lenovo SL400 | Core 2 Duo T9400 | Mushkin 4GB PC2-5300
Phenom II X6 1055T @ 3.5GHz| Asus M4A89GTD PRO/USB3 | 6TB FlexRAID | Dell 2405FPW | flickr
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked ShadowVlican for this post.
Search Forums
