Off Topic

Brexit: UK votes to leave the EU

  • Last Updated:
  • Apr 25th, 2017 11:21 pm
Tags:
None
Deal Expert
User avatar
Dec 7, 2012
22451 posts
4580 upvotes
GTHA
Dizzee Discusses Brexit with Pharrell and Scott Vener.

Sr. Member
May 17, 2010
535 posts
33 upvotes
[QUOTE]Britain could be offered the option of imposing a seven-year emergency brake on immigration from the EU as part of a deal to keep it in the single market, under plans being considered by top officials.

British and European officials believe the move would soften the economic shock of leaving the EU while also addressing people's concerns over immigration.

It would also soften the political blow to the European project amid concerns that growing Eurosceptism throughout the continent could lead to other countries splitting from Brussels.
[/QUOTE]

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... z4FMPI6Z5J
Deal Addict
User avatar
May 22, 2005
2668 posts
55 upvotes
Thornhill
What happened to the apocalyptic economic predictions?
Banned
Dec 5, 2015
2038 posts
407 upvotes
Concord, ON
spol wrote:
Jul 24th, 2016 4:50 pm
What happened to the apocalyptic economic predictions?
Already happening ...companies have cut investments and cut any expansion due to uncertainty ..

Economy is shrinking at fastest rate since 2009 and heading for recession
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/201 ... ng-and-se/

Also pound free fall is going to lead to inflation and tough times ahead
Deal Addict
User avatar
May 22, 2005
2668 posts
55 upvotes
Thornhill
GrandePike wrote:
Jul 24th, 2016 10:35 pm
Already happening ...companies have cut investments and cut any expansion due to uncertainty ..

Economy is shrinking at fastest rate since 2009 and heading for recession
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/201 ... ng-and-se/
Looks like it was already shrinking and was on a long term downtrend, but it went down at a faster rate.

Image
Banned
Dec 5, 2015
2038 posts
407 upvotes
Concord, ON
spol wrote:
Jul 24th, 2016 11:37 pm
Looks like it was already shrinking and was on a long term downtrend, but it went down at a faster rate.

Image
Nope...brexit caused it to actually contract as in negative growth.. not simply slowing growth
Deal Addict
Feb 9, 2008
2363 posts
171 upvotes
spol wrote:
Jul 24th, 2016 11:37 pm
Looks like it was already shrinking and was on a long term downtrend, but it went down at a faster rate.
Britain's economy has been a fantasy for years, based primarily on selling houses to each other at ever-increasing prices.
Deal Addict
User avatar
May 22, 2005
2668 posts
55 upvotes
Thornhill
movieman wrote:
Jul 25th, 2016 11:19 am
Britain's economy has been a fantasy for years, based primarily on selling houses to each other at ever-increasing prices.
I wonder if it has anything to do with these super low interest rates. ;-)
Banned
Dec 5, 2015
2038 posts
407 upvotes
Concord, ON
movieman wrote:
Jul 25th, 2016 11:19 am
Britain's economy has been a fantasy for years, based primarily on selling houses to each other at ever-increasing prices.
Well it was the financial trading hub for EU which kept it afloat... with brexit they aren't part of EU and obviously won't and can't be the financial center for it
Sr. Member
May 17, 2010
535 posts
33 upvotes
EU needs Britian more then the UK needs them. Obviously there will be economic uncertainty until everything is sorted.

EU is already starting to bend on their free movement policy when it comes to staying in the single market.
Deal Addict
Jan 17, 2012
2286 posts
76 upvotes
Toronto
As normal, the will if the people meams nothing. A "hairdresser" complained to the courts that Brexit cannot proceed without a parliamentary vote and the court agreed. 3 judges ruled that Brexit will need a vote on parliament before it is triggered.

Seems like a smart way for the courts to shut down Brexit without attacking the referendum...if they tried to invalidate the vote it would be seen as undemocratic so they have just separates the call for Brexit from the triggering of it. So to trigger Brexit the governmenr would need a seperate parliamentary approval meabing Brexit would likey not be triggered.

It is just judicial and political gamesmanship at the voters expense.

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/uk- ... smsnnews11
Deal Fanatic
User avatar
May 9, 2007
5517 posts
553 upvotes
Vancouver Island, BC
silky28 wrote:
Nov 3rd, 2016 2:02 pm
As normal, the will if the people meams nothing. A "hairdresser" complained to the courts that Brexit cannot proceed without a parliamentary vote and the court agreed. 3 judges ruled that Brexit will need a vote on parliament before it is triggered.
In the interest of accuracy,
Financial entrepreneur Gina Miller, a lead claimant in the case, said the lawsuit wasn't an attempt to stop Brexit — just to ensure that Parliament is sovereign.
Hairdresser Deir Santos is described as "another claimant".
Seems like a smart way for the courts to shut down Brexit without attacking the referendum...if they tried to invalidate the vote it would be seen as undemocratic so they have just separates the call for Brexit from the triggering of it. So to trigger Brexit the governmenr would need a seperate parliamentary approval meabing Brexit would likey not be triggered.
This doesn't seem to me to be much of a threat. The majority Conservatives have a prime minister who said she would have the UK leave the EU and, acording to the article the opposition supports implementing the referendum result.
Of course there is a mandate for leaving the EU, and we have to accept and respect the result of the referendum," the opposition Labour Party's Brexit spokesman, Keir Starmer, told the BBC. "But the terms, and how we leave the EU, are vitally important."
Earthlings, you're evicted.
You are not getting the damage deposit back.

God
Deal Addict
Apr 28, 2004
1564 posts
189 upvotes
As normal, you don't understand how democracy works. The governing party can't bypass Parliament by using a referendum. Same reason Al Gore lost the presidency, even though he won the popular vote 50,999,897 to 50,456,002.
Deal Addict
Nov 24, 2013
3615 posts
814 upvotes
Kingston, ON
Brexit is the UK equivalent of QC leaving Canada on a 50%+1 vote. It's always going to be a contentious issue, even with a victory in a "non-binding" referendum. Just like it would be in QC, the result is regionalized, so while the "UK" may want to Leave, the Scots, for example, would sooner leave the UK than the EU,

Image

Consent of Parliament to triggering Article 50 shouldn't be a barrier for the Tories. They have a strong majority that would presumably support their appointed PM. If there's a hangup, I'm guessing members don't want to go on record for one side over another. Cameron supported Remain but resigned. Johnson and Gove supported Leave, then disappeared when faced with the prospect of actually having to lead the UK through Brexit. Farage and UKIP can't get their shit together. Labour is overwhelmingly (though not universally) on the Remain side, and with its civil war settled should stick to that stance. Basically, everyone knows where the opposition stands, but the Tory schism leaves it up in the air whether they'd vote to invoke or not.

There's some irony in the unelected PM, who wouldn't dare call an early election despite the party shakeup, being the 'defender of democracy' in working to uphold the referendum result. I don't know what the right answer is. Would the result be the same if put to a second vote?
× < >
Rotate image Save Cancel

Top