Art and Photography

Canon 18-135mm or Canon 18-200mm

  • Last Updated:
  • Aug 11th, 2017 6:36 pm
[OP]
Jr. Member
May 11, 2015
138 posts
192 upvotes
Vancouver, BC

Canon 18-135mm or Canon 18-200mm

Hello,

I have been offered an offer for both the Canon EF-S 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6 IS and Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM for a great price.

I am leaning on getting the 18-200mm for the extra zoom but was wondering if anyone would recommend the 18-135mm over the 18-200mm for any reason(s) despite them costing me the same price from a couple friends. (Build quality, photo quality, etc)
From what I have gathered in brief, the 18-135mm lens has better image quality than the 18-200mm. Is there any other reasons as to why I should be picking one over the other?

* used only for photography with a Canon SL1, do not do videography. Thinking of making the switch to replace 18-55mm STM and 55-250mm IS (don't feel like I need the range)

Thanks in advance.
Last edited by FoodieEd on Aug 9th, 2017 10:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
7 replies
Deal Addict
User avatar
Mar 23, 2008
3809 posts
1668 upvotes
Edmonton
I've been hoping for an answer on this thread, as I'm looking at one of these two lenses as a "walk-about" lens on an upcoming trip... I currently carry a bag with an 10-22, 18-55, and 70-300. It would be nice to cut that back.

C
Sr. Member
Aug 1, 2010
699 posts
264 upvotes
Montreal
Weight, the 18-135 is slightly lighter by about 100 grams.

So in a lighter smaller package, you get better image quality, go for the 18-135.
Portrait and Wedding Photographer - Instagram
Deal Addict
Jan 18, 2010
4553 posts
1166 upvotes
Canada
The 18-135mm STM has very nice image quality and good build quality
I would pick it over the 18-200mm, unless you really need the range (in that case keep your 55-250mm).
Zoomer $36 2GB LTE Plan
Deal Addict
Nov 21, 2008
1167 posts
180 upvotes
North Vancouver, BC
Having owned both, I preferred the 18-135 for image quality and focus speed. It's also better for video as it's noticeably quieter when changing focal length and focusing.
Member
Aug 10, 2004
386 posts
27 upvotes
Toronto
you mentioned that you have the 55-250 and you're not sure you need that range. do you normally use up to 200mm even? you can take a look through your past photos and see how often you've used the 135-200mm range. if it's not too often, you're probably not going to miss it. the 18-135 should be a better bet overall for image quality. with the 18-200, it's a nice walk around lens but the versatility of having that extra reach comes at the price of image quality.
Deal Addict
User avatar
Mar 23, 2008
3809 posts
1668 upvotes
Edmonton
Thanks for the input, ya'll! I'll keep my eyes peeled for a used 18-135 STM!

C

Top