i got this blurb form this site.. have a look.. lots of debating.I already know a bit about both designations. The CFA designation is much harder to achieve it requires 3 exams that can only be obtained trhough at least three years of study. The be awarded the CFA charter you also need to be suitably experienced in making investment decisions.
Ive heard that CFA is more for someone trying to get into the buy-side while perhaps MBA is more suited to sell-side.
I will be insteredted to hear from any insiders that work in the investment industry what they think of CFAs and MBAs in Asia, especially in Singapore, Hong Kong etc.
http://info.channelnewsasia.com/bb/v...c.php?t=17344&
-
Jan 20th, 2006 01:07 PM #1
CFA vs. MBA
I understand that they are 2 different avenues of furthering your education. I am just curious as to people's opinions on the two.
If you had to choose, which one would you choose?
What are the advantages and disadvantages of each?
What do you think the ROI (Return on Investment) is of each?
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked babysham for this post.
-
Sponsored Links - Join the RedFlagDeals.com community and remove this ad.
-
Jan 20th, 2006 01:21 PM #2
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked rdtx2002 for this post.
-
Jan 20th, 2006 01:56 PM #3Hard to compare but IMO, an MBA from top school > CFA > MBA from a bottom feeder
Originally Posted by rdtx2002
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked Hymac for this post.
-
Jan 20th, 2006 04:55 PM #4Jr. Member

- Join Date
- May 29th, 2005
- Location
- Toronto
- Posts
- 122
It depends what you want to do: back office analysis, or front office management.
ROI is maybe not the best measure, a CFA can be had for $5000ish (depending on your study aids), but a good MBA should set you back 6-10 times more.
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked Bradjar for this post.
-
Jan 21st, 2006 10:57 AM #5Jr. Member

- Join Date
- Aug 14th, 2005
- Posts
- 164
i think CFA is worth more than MBA, CFA is also alot harder to get than MBA.
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked keunganator for this post.
-
Jan 21st, 2006 11:26 AM #6'CFA' is a certification, not an education. An MBA is often/usually used by non-business people to move to a business focus, whereas you have to already have financial experience to become a CFA. And a CFA is relatively limited in scope and does not offer the variety of opportunities an MBA can.
Originally Posted by babysham
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked Rehan for this post.
-
Jan 21st, 2006 06:18 PM #7
they both go hand in hand. I wouldn't think of one as a way of getting out of the other - especially if you want to work on the buy-side. you don't need the CFA if you're not going to be in the finance field. but if you will be in finance, you need a CFA and an MBA at some point.
my plan is to get my CFA (or at least have cleared all the exams) before going back for an MBA. from what I've noticed, people tend to do this in the opposite order. maybe someone who has one of these two can shed more light..
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked codemonkey for this post.
Search Forums


