But a newbie would not understand a word of that.
...voting often has less to do with the product being voted on as it does on the participant's ability to actively secure votes...
Jan 23rd, 2013 8:56 pm
Jan 23rd, 2013 9:18 pm
Sorry, was doing my dailies...
Jan 23rd, 2013 10:09 pm
Jan 23rd, 2013 10:23 pm
Jan 23rd, 2013 10:46 pm
Jan 23rd, 2013 10:56 pm
Jan 23rd, 2013 10:59 pm
Yes, it was meant to be opaquely tongue in cheek. :embarassed:
As I said earlier today "what, wait, there was a FAQ being written, how did I miss that!". Combining the two would be a tl;dr entry I think though.
Jan 23rd, 2013 11:03 pm
Buddy, it's not like we were hiding it, lol.
Jan 23rd, 2013 11:06 pm
Dunno... I've been arse deep in home renovations for a few weeks so must've missed it completely. Feel free to slice and dice -- the bane of my professional and personal writing is that out of a dominating desire to avoid imprecision I am much too verbose.ronin1701 wrote: ↑Jan 23rd, 2013 11:03 pmBuddy, it's not like we were hiding it, lol.
It could be tl/dr but then again there might be a bit too much detail in it to begin with? Don't get me wrong - it's really good, but when I wrote the FAQ avoiding bloat was the hardest part.
Let me have a think about this.
Jan 23rd, 2013 11:07 pm
I'm like that too, so I know where you're coming from. Some of my memos have become the stuff of legend, lol.
Jan 24th, 2013 12:34 am
Jan 24th, 2013 7:50 am
Sounds good, I think it covers it quite neutrally.
Jan 24th, 2013 8:00 am
Jan 24th, 2013 8:22 am
Thanks - I tried to keep as much of your original content as possible. My main objective was to edit it down in length (it's probably ~ 1/2 the length of what I started with) and to integrate the two parts (judging and voting) into one.
Jan 24th, 2013 8:55 am
Can you insert it after "What is a Rafflecopter?" or I'd say after #2 like you suggested.ronin1701 wrote: ↑Jan 24th, 2013 8:22 amThanks - I tried to keep as much of your original content as possible. My main objective was to edit it down in length (it's probably ~ 1/2 the length of what I started with) and to integrate the two parts (judging and voting) into one.
If you (and others - thanks window) are happy with it, I can see about integrating it into the FAQ.
Question: where would you insert it? My initial thoughts are either at #2 or at #13 in the Table of Contents.