Thread: Defrocked priest guilty in rape trial
-
Feb 7th, 2005 08:40 PM
#1
Defrocked priest guilty in rape trial
a good start to convict these excuses for human beings...one down, hundreds (may be thousands) to go
----
[url]http://edition.cnn.com/2005/LAW/02/07/church.abuse.shanley.ap/index.html[/url]
CAMBRIDGE, Massachusetts (AP) -- Defrocked priest Paul Shanley, the most notorious figure in the sex scandal that rocked the Boston Archdiocese, was convicted Monday of raping and fondling a boy at his Roman Catholic church during the 1980s.
-
-
Feb 7th, 2005 10:27 PM
#2
That sure brings back memories for me.
It was pretty much a year ago to the day that I served on a jury and convicted a man of child molestation. He also had church ties. Saw alot of similarites in there.
Though in my case my time is wasted as the bastard gets a new trial, and will most likely cover up the holes in his story and walk. :o
-
Feb 8th, 2005 02:32 AM
#3
Those homosexual pedophiles are everywhere. If they aren't posing as preists their posing as hockey coaches or boy scout leaders. It's pretty sickening
-
Feb 8th, 2005 08:34 PM
#4
[QUOTE=lostmymelon]Those homosexual pedophiles are everywhere. If they aren't posing as preists their posing as hockey coaches or boy scout leaders. It's pretty sickening[/QUOTE]
a pedophile is pedophile...homoexual or otherwise
your statement makes you look silly for only codemning homo pedophiles
-
Feb 8th, 2005 10:37 PM
#5
[QUOTE=lostmymelon]Those homosexual pedophiles are everywhere. If they aren't posing as preists their posing as hockey coaches or boy scout leaders. It's pretty sickening[/QUOTE]
Yeah, but heterosexual pedophiles are great! :rolleyes:
-
Feb 9th, 2005 12:25 AM
#6
The original post stated that a Man molested a boy. That would make him a homosexual pedophile.
What exactly did I say that was silly? Where in my post did I say that I don't condemn heterosexual pedophiles (both male and female pedophiles)?
Political correctness has gotten so bad that you can't even state the obvious without bringing forth the rath of the pc loonies.
-
Feb 9th, 2005 12:38 AM
#7
[QUOTE=lostmymelon]The original post stated that a Man molested a boy. That would make him a homosexual pedophile.
What exactly did I say that was silly? Where in my post did I say that I don't condemn heterosexual pedophiles (both male and female pedophiles)?
Political correctness has gotten so bad that you can't even state the obvious without bringing forth the rath of the pc loonies.[/QUOTE]
Agreed.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules