those are the timmings for ram. the lower or "tighter" timing, the better.
for that specific number it is
RAS# to CAS# delay
This refers to the Row Address Strobe to Column Address Strobe delay time.
but out of the two I've heard that the rev. 2 is better
-
Oct 29th, 2006 08:00 PM #1
Difference between CL 4-4-4-15 and 4-5-4-15 RAM?
I just noticed I have writen down two, almost identical, Ram kits to purchase for my new PC:
Ocz Platinum Xtc PC2-6400 2GB 2X1GB DDR2-800 CL4-5-4-15 240PIN Dimm Dual Channel Memory Kit
OCZ Platinum XTC REV.2 PC2-6400 2GB 2X1GB DDR2-800 CL4-4-4-15 240PIN DIMM Dual Channel Memory Kit
The later is $30 more.
For those more familiar with RAM, could you let me know what the one number variance "4" instead of "5" means and if spending another $30 is worth it?
Thanks!
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked spinbot for this post.
-
Sponsored Links - Join the RedFlagDeals.com community and remove this ad.
-
Oct 29th, 2006 09:31 PM #2
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked champ91 for this post.
-
Oct 29th, 2006 09:33 PM #3
probably not worth the extra $30
i say this without knowing the overclocking potential improvement from the original to revision 2
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked ShadowVlican for this post.
-
Oct 29th, 2006 11:23 PM #4Deal Addict




- Join Date
- Sep 9th, 2004
- Posts
- 2,248
Retailer I bought it from said dont bother paying more for the 4-4-4-15, as you will not see any difference.
If you're so anal about it, then may I suggest you go all out and get that G.Skill ram which is $100 more but will overclock well.
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked silentio for this post.
-
Oct 30th, 2006 04:04 AM #5
that slight change in timings I don't think will make a difference, but I just heard that the Rev. 2 is better, but then i heard it from a OCZ tech so he just might but pushing the more expensive product....but it also might be with compatibility
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked champ91 for this post.
-
Oct 30th, 2006 05:06 AM #6
you should always try to buy newest reversion
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked importpsycho for this post.
-
Oct 30th, 2006 10:01 AM #7
I doubt you'll notice any difference in performance between the two types of ram, especially since you do not know what the numbers mean.
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked PennyArcade for this post.
-
Oct 30th, 2006 10:07 AM #8
Read a few performance test reports.
In general high-performance RAM upgrades of any kind are not worth your money. At most you will see a 5% performance increase on memory-intensive tasks, which is pretty much undetectable without a stopwatch. Your dollars would be better spent on any of:
a) more memory
b) bigger and faster disk drive with a bigger cache
c) faster graphics card
d) faster CPU
e) faster motherboard
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked Aske001 for this post.
-
Oct 30th, 2006 10:28 AM #9
In terms of performance increase, I agree that you will not see anything. Even if you measure the difference through benchmarking, we're talking about a difference of 1-3%.
However I would recommend investing this $30 in the newer revision anyway. My reasoning is that when you go to re-sell this RAM kit one day, you'll sell quicker with a later revision._______________
Main: Intel 2600K @ 4.8GHz | Gigabyte P67A-UD7-B3 | 16GB Corsair DDR3-2000 | 2 x 120GB OCZ Vertex 2 in RAID0 | 7 x 2TB WD Caviar Black | 3WARE 9650SE | Antec 1200 | Seasonic M12D 850W | 1.5GB GTX 580 | 2 x 27" Asus VE278Q | Auzentech Prelude | Win7 Pro 64-bit
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked Oversized Rooster for this post.
-
Oct 30th, 2006 11:54 AM #10
I got the Rev2 more because of better compatibility. You only need to really worry about the first number anyway, the rest don't make much of a difference from what I understand.
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked mebiuspower for this post.
-
Oct 30th, 2006 11:55 AM #11
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked Amourek for this post.
Search Forums


