Actually, your carbon footprint will go down if you have more kids. Keeping everything the same, the carbon calculation will yield a smaller footprint for a man living with his wife and 8 kids than a wife alone. So, go forth and multiply.
-
Jan 9th, 2008 09:51 PM #31_______________
If you are looking to purchase a Monarch home in Ottawa, I can help walk you through the process. We just bought one and can offer advice on upgrades, among other things. Please PM for details
Feel free to thank me if you find my posts helpful
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked canabiz for this post.
-
Jan 10th, 2008 08:40 AM #32Sr. Member



- Join Date
- Mar 28th, 2007
- Location
- Toronto
- Posts
- 942
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked branat for this post.
-
Jan 30th, 2008 06:03 PM #33
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked teknoluv for this post.
-
Feb 1st, 2008 10:02 AM #34
immigrants also tend to be more efficient. western people tend to think a 2000 foot home is necessary to have a spouse and 2 kids. immigrants on the other hand would think thats enough for a spouse and 4 kids.
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked st7860 for this post.
-
Feb 1st, 2008 02:14 PM #35Member
[OP]


- Join Date
- Jan 1st, 2006
- Posts
- 211
What an interesting read after revisiting this topic.
For the record, I am pro-immigration, and our family is first generation Canadian.
In my estimation, our family consumed less overall in past life in Malaysia.
The man on the radio struck a cord with me as I realized my family's 'foot print' would be smaller if not in Canada, that is all.
I thought it was interesting.....
Seems the impetus is on bringing the world up to NA standards, but might that not be hazardous to the world?
Just saying, important to think of all these things in policy planning. Immigration helps us all live a good life, the result of less would be rising costa and a lower standard of living... but isn't that what Kyoto is supposed to do?
Also, when studying at UBC, we discussed the local Haida, and according to anthropology prof, they were third wave of migration, displacing two previous Asian migrations. Does that not make them immigrants too, albeit ~ 5000 years prior to me?
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked stewpy for this post.
-
Feb 1st, 2008 03:14 PM #36
Agreed, there is no difference in immigrants now and then. The whole idea of immigration hurting the environment is nonsense. If someone lives here, or there, or anywheres, that is irrelvant. It's the way of life and how someone utilizes their environment that causes the impact.
I personally see some goods here in Canada in what we do, at least we have it in our mind sets that we know we are impacting our environment and we are starting (slowly) to do something about it. Recycling, implement laws and standards to protect our environment, etc... We are on moving a long, however, we still have a lot of things to do!Last edited by majesus; Feb 1st, 2008 at 03:19 PM.
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked majesus for this post.
-
Feb 1st, 2008 05:02 PM #37
It all depends on where the immigrants came from and their wealth. Many immigrants I know consider 2000 sqft is a small house to have a spouse and 2 kids. In addition, the Canadian I know who were here for generations consider 2000 sqft is a big house for a spouse and 2 kids.
Last edited by gman; Feb 1st, 2008 at 05:07 PM.
_______________
Too many people spend money they haven't earned to buy things they don't want, to impress people they don't like. -- Will Smith
Growing older is mandatory. Growing up is optional.
Stay hungry, stay foolish.
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked gman for this post.
Search Forums

