I agree 100%! I find it quite funny how person that started this thread completely omitted Nintendo from the title; weird how the casual gamer has been brainwashed, eh?Originally Posted by Leshita
![]()
-
Dec 5th, 2004 02:58 PM #16
Looks nice.
But I won't get excited until I see in game shots and videos. These are just renderings, and really don't reflect what the hardware is capable of.
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked Carnage for this post.
-
Dec 6th, 2004 05:32 AM #17Deal Addict




- Join Date
- Mar 26th, 2003
- Location
- Binbrook, Ontario
- Posts
- 1,168
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked bisk for this post.
-
Dec 6th, 2004 06:43 AM #18Member


- Join Date
- Jan 9th, 2004
- Posts
- 457
Screenshots looks good but they're definately just movie shots. If anyone wants to get into real gaming, they should pick up a PC. Obviously it's always way ahead of all the consoles when most video cards cost 2-3 times the amount of the console alone. I found it quite humorous when someone demoed Halo 2 for me, because it looked like a 3 year old PC game.
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked zuberal for this post.
-
Dec 6th, 2004 09:41 AM #19It's this elitist attitude which is a big reason why PC gaming is dying. "Real" gaming requires a $2000+ PC with a $500 graphics card that needs to be replaced every 2 years to keep up? Graphics aren't everything and consoles have several other advantages over PC games. I have two consoles and a PC (with average specifications) and enjoy them all for gaming.
Originally Posted by zuberal
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked Talamasca for this post.
-
Dec 6th, 2004 10:17 AM #20They're actually not movie shots I beleive.
Originally Posted by zuberal
They're just rendered images to show what the next gen systems gameplay *might* look. I'd guess that those images weren't made with the actual prototype hardware.
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked Carnage for this post.
-
Dec 6th, 2004 11:03 AM #21In fact, I already think that the jump here isn't all that big.
Originally Posted by Leshita
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked felixdd for this post.
-
Dec 6th, 2004 11:55 AM #22Deal Addict




- Join Date
- Jan 1st, 2002
- Location
- BC
- Posts
- 1,097
Maybe I'm the only person not impressed, Yes, the pic has more details, looks more real, but it's still pretty easy for me to tell it's CG, not real photo. I'm expecting to see next generation consoles give me some game scenes, such as car chasing, at first sight, I couldn't tell it's TV news, or it's the game.
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked Raxel for this post.
-
Dec 6th, 2004 01:13 PM #23Uh huh. And when Xbox 1 came out and PC gamers saw Halo 1 and DOA3, they were drooling and saw nothing that looked like it at the time on the PC. When the next gen consoles come out, PC will be slightly behind again just because PC devs need to code for lower-specc'ed hardware. Wait till you see the Xbox 2 and PS3 game demos at next year's E3.
Originally Posted by zuberal
We have yet to see any mention of Nintendo's "Revolution" hardware which is why I didn't mention it. Nintendo has said they are not focusing on graphics anymore which is kinda worrisome.
If those game concept shots can be rendered in real-time for the next gen consoles, that would be pretty amazing. Compare the shots there to Madden and the difference is night/day._______________
I'm on the road to 5000...
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked ledorky for this post.
-
Dec 6th, 2004 03:18 PM #24
I believe it when I see it. Especially with all thoses texture, a hefty amount of memory will be needed.
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked Wassup Doc for this post.
Search Forums




