And speaking of the supposedly cushy accident benefits, here is an excerpt of what drivers can expect if they actually need to collect on those benefits:
http://www.fairassociation.ca/wp-conten ... 000167.pdf
I know you don't like the Toronto Sun, so here is a link to the original FSCO ruling:FSCO ruling A09-000167 wrote: Mr. C. underwent a very aggressive and at times inappropriate cross-examination. Inappropriate
in that, counsel for Coachman screamed some of his questions at Mr. C. with the clear intention,
in my view, of intimidating Mr. C. As well, counsel glared intensely while firing off questions at
a very rapid pace. In addition, counsel unnecessarily and redundantly repeated questions that
already had been answered. Objections to counsel’s behaviour were consistently ignored.
...
Mrs. C.’s underwent an aggressive cross-examination. Her cross-examination, on three separate
afternoons, was double if not triple the time that Coachman’s counsel spent on cross-examining
Mr. C. Mrs. C. responded to questions in a detailed and non-evasive manner. Nevertheless, she
was repetitively asked the same questions in a tone and manner, which in my view, was meant to
be intimidating. She broke down crying several times. Counsel for Coachman ignored any
direction to curtail his repetitive questioning.
http://www.fairassociation.ca/wp-conten ... 000167.pdf