Given the times, would you support a movement to reduce Muslim immigration?

[Mace]

asim99, I am calling on you to state your case - in 500 words or less - as to why Muslim immigration should at present remain at current levels (apprx. 50,000/year) or increase.

Two conditions -

1) No name-calling.
2) No mention of Tamils.

[sk8]

Can you explain. By reducing muslim population here, how can you reduce terrorism?

Are we talking numbers? Stats? # of terrorists per square kmeters?

[i6s1]

Muslim immigration should increase because muslims are far more likely to be radicalized in the ME then they are here. The more muslims come to Canada, the more moderate muslims there are in the world.

The number of muslims here doesn't make much difference for terrorism, if there aren't enough Islamofacists trained as pilots in the USA, OBL can import them from SA.

[ChinpokoMon]

Flame on!

[i6s1]

oh yeah, in before lock.

[Rehan]

Mace, how about if the poll question is changed to ask whether the Muslim immigration should be changed relative to immigration of other visible minorities?
(That probably won't fit in the poll question itself, so put it in the opening post.)

[Marc7]

***

[Absolute]

Given the times?? You mean terrorism? I'm confused as to the reasons.

[afong56]

can the op explain how this poll is not flat out ignorance and racism?

what an ugly, ugly sentiment it represents. . .

[Mace]

Mace, how about if the poll question is changed to ask whether the Muslim immigration should be changed relative to immigration of other visible minorities?
(That probably won't fit in the poll question itself, so put it in the opening post.)

I can do that - but how about unlocking the previous Muslim immigration poll thread first, and I'll rephrase the poll question here -

[eelfliw]

What does religion have to do with immigration anyways?

Our charter of rights guarantees religious freedom. If the immigration dept denies an application based on the religious believes of the applicant, the immigration dept is operating in contravention of the charter.

[Marc7]

This thread is racist indeed.

let us say this is done, what do u wanna do with the muslims here?

either way, this will be falling in alqaida trap. I'll let u figure why, if anything, they are successfully polarizing the world.

here is an excerpt I read:

This, in turn, translates into misunderstanding and resentment among some Muslims and local populations that may lead to an agreeable environment for certain al-Qaeda or al-Qaeda affiliated organizations to orchestrate similar bombings in more European capitals.


from http://www.pinr.com/report.php?ac=vi...&language_id=1

[konfusion666]

lol, i don't know why he is so persistent.

[asim99]

asim99, I am calling on you to state your case - in 500 words or less - as to why Muslim immigration should at present remain at current levels (apprx. 50,000/year) or increase.

Two conditions -

1) No name-calling.
2) No mention of Tamils.

actually tamils are a proven great and serious concern to the safety of canadians, muslims are not

[Rehan]

Mace, do you know the difference between an Ismaili and a "Wahhabi"? Are they both in the same category for immigration? (Answer without googling... )