Thread: HP AMD Puma based Laptop $799
-
Jul 23rd, 2008 02:12 PM
#1
Newbie
HP AMD Puma based Laptop $799
http://www.bestbuy.ca/catalog/prodde...C-email_weekly
I think it's a hot deal, if you looking for a Media Center Laptop.
Purely from Media Center point of view, or Video quality point of view, Puma is better than Intel's Centrino 2 solution.
-
-
Jul 23rd, 2008 02:55 PM
#2
boo amd, also this laptop sucks. theres a lawsuit against it.
_______________
HAPPY TWO YEARS ANNIVERSARY TO RFD AND ME!! =)

-
Jul 23rd, 2008 03:03 PM
#3
AMD needs to come up with better processors.
-
Jul 23rd, 2008 03:47 PM
#4
Actually, this laptop isn't that bad if you want an IGP. It's one of the top in the market atm.
AMD laptop processors aren't too bad as well, if you compare it to an Intel processor at stock speeds.
See the review of a lappy in the same series: http://www.notebookreview.com/default.asp?newsID=4486
-
Jul 23rd, 2008 06:54 PM
#5
There was a very similar laptop 2-3 weeks ago at BB for $650 (3 GB RAM, 250GB HD, 2.0GHz X2 CPU, nVidia IGP).
Not the newest tech like this one, but $150 cheaper.
-
Jul 23rd, 2008 09:40 PM
#6
[OP]
Newbie

Originally Posted by
Zenphic
Actually, this laptop isn't that bad if you want an IGP. It's one of the top in the market atm.
AMD laptop processors aren't too bad as well, if you compare it to an Intel processor at stock speeds.
See the review of a lappy in the same series:
http://www.notebookreview.com/default.asp?newsID=4486
When comes to graphic performance, it even beats some discrete cards like Nvidia 8400GS
-
Jul 23rd, 2008 10:02 PM
#7

Originally Posted by
spazzamatic
boo amd, also this laptop sucks. theres a lawsuit against it.
This laptop was just released. Can you explain what the deal is with a lawsuit?
-
Jul 23rd, 2008 10:10 PM
#8
The IGP graphic on the PUMA platform is fantastic. I got it and actually does beat my discrete graphic performance from my nVidia card that I have on my desktop. Now I have a laptop that I can actually play game on.
-
Jul 23rd, 2008 10:44 PM
#9
Newbie
I just bought this laptop on Sunday and will be returning it this weekend. I would avoid it...overall its a good deal but battery life is terrible. I get around 1.5 hours, 2 if I'm lucky.
-
Jul 23rd, 2008 11:03 PM
#10
As much as i was an amd fanboy, stay away from amd (for now).
They've been pretty much "out" of the processor race for almost 1.5 years. Intel knocked them out pretty much with Core2duo. They're integrated graphics solution is great which is not surprising because they also own ATI. However they're still lacking and lagging behind in overall performance compared to intel cores.
-
Jul 23rd, 2008 11:12 PM
#11
What people don't understand is that AMD is not trying to out CPU Intel here with Puma.
They are trying to come up with a platform.
Puma is a noble effort but it's battery sucking makes it a bad choice for a laptop. Puma would be awesome for a HTPC or a laptop that you plan to keep plugged in.
-
Jul 24th, 2008 12:41 AM
#12
Newbie

Originally Posted by
goonx126
As much as i was an amd fanboy, stay away from amd (for now).
They've been pretty much "out" of the processor race for almost 1.5 years. Intel knocked them out pretty much with Core2duo. They're integrated graphics solution is great which is not surprising because they also own ATI. However they're still lacking and lagging behind in overall performance compared to intel cores.
TurionX2 Ultra (the ones found in Puma platforms) chips are more than enough for the majority of the people out there. CPUs these days are definitely not what's bottlenecking most systems. You've been brainwashed into thinking that a faster CPU means your system will run faster but unless you're encoding videos, you won't notice a difference.
As a matter of fact, your graphics solution WILL bottleneck you when trying to play games and watch HD movies.
That's why Puma is a giant step forward in chipset technology. The IGP solution just hasn't been keeping up with the Processor advancements.
If you're buying a laptop with a discrete video card then yes, go ahead and look for Centrino 2. If you're just using onboard video, Puma will give you the bang for your buck.
Now, as for why the battery life sucks right now for this HP platform...reviewers aren't sure. AMD claims that Puma should be more efficient than their old platforms so this may just be an issue with HP or even with drivers. We'll find out in the coming weeks as other companies start releasing Puma based laptops.
-
Jul 24th, 2008 08:22 AM
#13
am i only the person who thought PUMA ment there would be a puma (clothing company) design on the hp?
im a noob
-
Jul 24th, 2008 09:16 AM
#14

Originally Posted by
simondaman
am i only the person who thought PUMA ment there would be a puma (clothing company) design on the hp?

im a noob

a ha ha nope don't feel bad
I was looking for a little lion symbol on the monitor cover
-
Jul 25th, 2008 12:14 AM
#15
Oh please.
Although AMD is not at the top, but their products are by no means not competitive or good. This is still a mighty fine laptop platform.
But anyways about the deal, it doesn't look all that special to me. Puma doesn't offer much over its predecessor, so this is more or less of an average deal.
Just another ordinary HP laptop.
Thanks anyway OP. Oh and welcome to RFD.
Last edited by xaueious; Jul 25th, 2008 at 12:17 AM.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
Forum Rules