What? No Harper fans here? Or, are they still sleeping?
View Poll Results: I would vote for
- Voters
- 93. You may not vote on this poll
-
Liberal Party of Canada
36 38.71% -
Conservative Party of Canada
28 30.11% -
New Democratic Party of Canada
15 16.13% -
Bloc Quebecois
4 4.30% -
Green Party of Canada
5 5.38% -
A party not listed here
0 0% -
Would not vote
5 5.38%
-
May 4th, 2005 10:00 AM #1
If there were an election today, who would you vote for? Part 2

Let's see if anything has changed since the last poll.
Bump as you vote please. Thanks.
-
Sponsored Links - Join the RedFlagDeals.com community and remove this ad.
-
May 4th, 2005 10:25 AM #2
-
May 4th, 2005 10:28 AM #3
Would it make any difference?
They come, mooch/steal and go._______________
"Squat Til You Puke"
"Shut the F... Up and Train"
-
May 4th, 2005 10:32 AM #4Also in the mean time drag us into a stupid war with a country whose name none of can pronounce right. Plus all kinds of cuts that will only benefit the wealthy.
Originally Posted by sk8
-
May 4th, 2005 10:45 AM #5Deal Fanatic




- Join Date
- Feb 25th, 2004
- Location
- toronto, ontario
- Posts
- 8,565
- Thanked 1 time for 1 post
looks like harper's forcing the election will make me vote martin
-
May 4th, 2005 11:02 AM #6
"looks like harper's forcing the election will make me vote martin"
That is a silly reason. The election will happen soon regardless. Why wait for Gomery?
"the Commissioner be directed to perform his duties without expressing any conclusion or recommendation regarding the civil or criminal liability of any person or organization and to ensure that the conduct of the inquiry does not jeopardize any ongoing criminal investigation or criminal proceedings;"
-
May 4th, 2005 11:06 AM #7Deal Guru




- Join Date
- Oct 15th, 2003
- Location
- Rothesay, NB
- Posts
- 10,879
- Thanked 162 times for 114 posts
I know you think that’s an ACE of an argument you have there (since you have now posted the same thing twice) but it really isn't, it only shows your contempt for a fair trial. The facts will still be released, and that is all that is needed. Do you really need somebody to tell you what to think?
Originally Posted by spidermoore
_______________
My Blog: This Old Kidney Updated last 01/24/2012
-
May 4th, 2005 11:16 AM #8Jr. Member

- Join Date
- May 6th, 2004
- Posts
- 194
- Thanked 2 times for 2 posts
Who needs the facts of the trial. The "FACT" that Martin is willing to sell his budget in order to retain power is good enough for me. He made a $7+ Billion swing in an attempt to save his hide. Before that, I would have preferred to wait until the Gomery report was produced. Now, I have enough evidence that this is not the person or the government I want leading my country.
-
May 4th, 2005 11:18 AM #9Deal Fanatic




- Join Date
- Jan 24th, 2002
- Location
- Hamilton
- Posts
- 7,756
- Thanked 9 times for 7 posts
ah, what the hell, it's not his $7B anyway...
Originally Posted by Lange
_______________
Whale Oil Beef Hooked, and don't buy from Tigerdirect.
-
May 4th, 2005 11:20 AM #10Deal Guru




- Join Date
- Oct 15th, 2003
- Location
- Rothesay, NB
- Posts
- 10,879
- Thanked 162 times for 114 posts
or instead of selling his budget to stay in power, maybe it shows a willingness to work with others in order to get something done while in power rather then have every bill shot down because of not having enough votes to get it passed. He's sharing power with the NDP, not hogging power.
Originally Posted by Lange
_______________
My Blog: This Old Kidney Updated last 01/24/2012
-
May 4th, 2005 11:24 AM #11
"I know you think that’s an ACE of an argument you have there (since you have now posted the same thing twice) but it really isn't, it only shows your contempt for a fair trial. The facts will still be released, and that is all that is needed. Do you really need somebody to tell you what to think?"
You just keep beating that strawman you keep setting up. Beat it good.
I don't need somebody to tell me what to think, that's why I'm not waiting for ONE GUYS OPINION on this, especially one guy appointed by the Liberals.
We don't need to wait for Gomery to know that the Liberals are and have been trying to cover this up as best as they could for YEARS. The specific people involved and to what degree is what Gomery may ferret out but the fact that the Liberals are waist deep in corruption is not in any doubt.
-
May 4th, 2005 11:24 AM #12What facts have not yet been released? (Except for some testimony still under publication ban due to pending criminal trials..)
Originally Posted by Ojam
Everything is available from www.gomery.ca._______________
So long. I'm outta here.
-
May 4th, 2005 11:25 AM #13Jr. Member

- Join Date
- May 6th, 2004
- Posts
- 194
- Thanked 2 times for 2 posts
Are you serious? Do you actually believe that? The word apologist is thrown around with more frequency than I would like...but come on! The timing is kind of odd don't you think? Funny how he is willing to "share power" when he is backed into a corner and not before it. Would you expect him to have been as Barney-esque with a majority gov't? He is selling out in the purest sence of the word, sacraficing the ideals of his party in order to retain power.
Originally Posted by Ojam
-
May 4th, 2005 11:25 AM #14Deal Fanatic




- Join Date
- Feb 25th, 2004
- Location
- toronto, ontario
- Posts
- 8,565
- Thanked 1 time for 1 post
nothing silly about that...i don't want early elections...we just had elections last year
Originally Posted by spidermoore
-
May 4th, 2005 11:26 AM #15Deal Guru




- Join Date
- Oct 15th, 2003
- Location
- Rothesay, NB
- Posts
- 10,879
- Thanked 162 times for 114 posts
No straw man needed, you said yourself that we shouldn't wait for the inquiry because it wasn't going to make any judgments. That sure sounds like you want somebody to tell you what to think.
Originally Posted by spidermoore
_______________
My Blog: This Old Kidney Updated last 01/24/2012
Search Forums
Reply With Quote