depends if you want AWD, if so, then 250 is your choice, they don't offer AWD in the 350
-
Jul 11th, 2007 09:17 PM #1
Leasing IS250 or IS350
The best 48mth lease price I can get for the IS250 is $800/mth with a $4500 MSD (returned when lease is over). (Financing is 3.1%, taxes in) This is for the top of the line with AWD and Navigation. Total cost of the car is ~$64000 after the buyout.
Good lease price?
I didn't look at the IS350 cause it's more $$$, but is it worth the extra?
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked enforcerviper for this post.
-
Sponsored Links - Join the RedFlagDeals.com community and remove this ad.
-
Jul 11th, 2007 10:01 PM #2
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked rogerrabbit168 for this post.
-
Jul 11th, 2007 10:28 PM #3
Get my car :P
I'm paying 500 a month to FINANCE :P_______________
- Private Investigator...contact me for your surveillance needs.
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked Spray for this post.
-
Jul 12th, 2007 06:46 AM #4
hmm well IS250 is a better choice i believe, on edmunds.com they tested both cars and noted that they would pick the IS250 over the IS350. Have you tried looking at leasebusters.com? There are a few IS250's on there, if you dont want a used one, you might as well see what they are paying.
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked azn_dan for this post.
-
Jul 12th, 2007 08:58 AM #5Jr. Member

- Join Date
- Mar 6th, 2006
- Location
- Toronto, ON
- Posts
- 134
If you don't need NAV then I would go with IS350, just because there's a big difference in power and fuel economy isn't that big of a difference. Another suggestion would be to wait for 2008 models to come out and see if they offer better discounts then.
Last edited by oscar_dog; Jul 12th, 2007 at 09:06 AM.
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked oscar_dog for this post.
-
Jul 12th, 2007 09:16 AM #6
even though there is a difference in hp, i believe the IS250 is around 250? while the IS350 is at 306hp. Though there is the difference, the IS350 is heavier and the IS250 has better stats then its heavier counterpart.
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked azn_dan for this post.
-
Jul 12th, 2007 09:26 AM #7
Were there discounts when moving the 2006 to 2007? It seems like these cars sell well, and they may not offer much, if anything.
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked enforcerviper for this post.
-
Jul 12th, 2007 10:08 AM #8Jr. Member

- Join Date
- Mar 6th, 2006
- Location
- Toronto, ON
- Posts
- 134
IS250: 204 hp, 185 lb/ft (Base curb weight: 3455 lbs)
IS350: 306 hp, 277 lb/ft (Base curb weight: 3527 lbs)
There is a big difference in performance.
With a maxed out security deposit or cash down payment (~$5000), you can get 0.9% financing, (although I was given this deal in Feb). I believe this is the only advertised discount I have seen.
Also, try APA, as they have special dealer pricing.
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked oscar_dog for this post.
-
Jul 12th, 2007 11:17 AM #9
Here is the link on the follow up test of the IS250 2007.
http://www.edmunds.com/apps/vdpconta...8/pageNumber=1
And i quote:
andAnd once you toss the IS 250 into a fast corner, the sport package really shows you something. The car settles quickly on its suspension into an effective cornering attitude and the stiff-sidewall tires help the steering react to subtle inputs more responsively than you'll find in an all-wheel-drive IS 350.
In tight-radius corners, the bumps that momentarily upset the IS 350 barely faze this buttoned-down IS 250. Given that the rear-wheel-drive, 3,527-pound IS 350 and rear-wheel-drive, 3,455-pound IS 250 have the same weight distribution of 52 percent front/48 percent rear, we're surprised the IS 250 feels so different.andAlthough it's down over 100 hp on the IS 350, the IS 250 is nearly 4 mph faster through the cones with a 70.4-mph result. This is blazing speed, and it puts the IS 250 ahead of the BMW 335i, not to mention about a half dozen very capable sports cars.
The rear-wheel-drive IS 250's overall grip on the skid pad is a fraction less than that of the rear-wheel-drive IS 350, as the IS 250 manages 0.84g versus the 0.87g we recorded for an IS 350 with 18-inch wheels and tires. The two cars are also about the same in braking performance, with the IS 250 posting the shortest stop from 60 mph at 113 feet.
And i rest my caseThough it's often overshadowed by the 306-hp IS 350, the IS 250 is actually Lexus' best effort at renewing some of the connection between the driver and the pavement that you expect in a sport sedan without giving up too much comfort in the process.
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked azn_dan for this post.
-
Jul 12th, 2007 11:59 AM #10Jr. Member

- Join Date
- Mar 6th, 2006
- Location
- Toronto, ON
- Posts
- 134
Thanks for the research, but Edmunds.com is comparing a manual IS250 with sports package vs. an IS350 with no sports package (they are using stats from their 335i vs. 350 comparison).
The IS250 is a great car too, but to say it out-performs an IS350 would be a huge mistake for Lexus' marketing plan.Last edited by oscar_dog; Jul 12th, 2007 at 12:13 PM.
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked oscar_dog for this post.
-
Jul 12th, 2007 12:24 PM #11
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked new_vr for this post.
-
Jul 12th, 2007 01:47 PM #12
Last edited by Evil Techie; Jul 12th, 2007 at 01:56 PM.
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked Evil Techie for this post.
-
Jul 12th, 2007 10:32 PM #13
The IS in general has really little room in the back seats and the IS250 feels very underpowered.
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked VorteC for this post.
-
Jul 13th, 2007 01:58 AM #14
save a bit of money and go for the 250. it's already a nice enough car as is. no need to pay more. have fun with it
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked bobbings for this post.
-
Jul 13th, 2007 10:35 AM #15
From the article i posted there seems to be no mention of the AWD IS350... they even mention:
Pretty sure they never mentioned the IS350 as being AWD, and that is why it is odd that the IS250 beat the IS350 through the slalomIn tight-radius corners, the bumps that momentarily upset the IS 350 barely faze this buttoned-down IS 250. Given that the rear-wheel-drive, 3,527-pound IS 350 and rear-wheel-drive, 3,455-pound IS 250 have the same weight distribution of 52 percent front/48 percent rear, we're surprised the IS 250 feels so different.Last edited by azn_dan; Jul 13th, 2007 at 10:39 AM.
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked azn_dan for this post.
Search Forums



