I would imagine such a thing would look quite unappealing on the property, and an general inconvenience to pass around.
It also wouldn't be very effective.
-
Apr 9th, 2009 11:13 PM #1
Manitoba Flooding Q
Since Manitoba has suffered flooding consistently over the last century - why don't people build a dike/earthen berm around their house to protect their house from the flooding? Yes you need to get out of the property but the driveways could easily be sandbagged when needed.
-
Sponsored Links - Join the RedFlagDeals.com community and remove this ad.
-
Apr 9th, 2009 11:59 PM #2
-
Apr 10th, 2009 07:05 AM #3Permanently Banned
[OP]
- Join Date
- Mar 2nd, 2009
- Location
- High Park
- Posts
- 96
I guess a house full of water every few years is much more appealing?
-
Apr 10th, 2009 12:37 PM #4
You do not realize the vastness of the flooding. People are sandbagging. 1000's of sandbags. But the water may still crest. You can't back out of your driveway. The whole neighbourhood floods. The picture below was taken this week. The orange tubes are dikes which the water has crested over.
-
Apr 10th, 2009 03:03 PM #5Deal Fanatic




- Join Date
- Dec 23rd, 2005
- Location
- NWO Headquarters. Coming soon to YOUR house!
- Posts
- 5,103
In Winnipeg they have the Duff Ditch.
No get the Simpsons outta the mind here. It's a very very large spillway to control the floods in the city proper.
The floodplain is so large there is no way to protect anyone's property all the time. It's the typical problem: The flood plain is especially good agricultural land that depends on these floods to re-invigorate the soil. The floods cause extensive property damage.
Stop the floods and you run the risk of making the land less arable.
It's a tradeoff that has been going on for a long time and floodsare almost expected to happen. The floodplain is tens of thousands of square kilometers covering 3 states and one province. Flood control is impossible to implement everywhere._______________
Energy can neither be created nor destroyed. It can only be wasted.
Red Green
-
Apr 10th, 2009 04:07 PM #6Member


- Join Date
- Feb 26th, 2008
- Location
- manitoba
- Posts
- 236
In the rural areas south of WPG, homeowners living near the Red River were to either build a permenant dike or raise the house as per 1997 flood levels in order to get insurance against flooding. Living inside a city/town, there are bylaws preventing you to build a permenant dike on your property or raising your yard elevation. Many smaller communities have a dike around them.
-
Apr 11th, 2009 12:59 AM #7
Manitoba has some of the worlds biggest and best flood prevention measures in place...it's not as simple as it seems...
_______________
People who are in my gang: Nikita, Spidey, weedb0y, jcoltage, deep, pitz, Sylvestre, Icedawn, 3weddings, Ambermoon, CSK'sMom, jazzsax, bokep, matdwyer, Dash, KorruptioN, angekfire, sxz, WontonTiger, YYZFA, king_george, 45ED, sxz, Ojam
*WE GONNA GIT YOU!
-
Apr 11th, 2009 08:59 AM #8
Because:
1. it is not effective for a big flood.
2. it causes money.
3. how high and big your dike you want that to be? If the flood level can be 2 floor up, do you really want a dike that high?
4. The most important ... this is NOT the solution. A temporary patch work at best._______________
Too many people spend money they haven't earned to buy things they don't want, to impress people they don't like. -- Will Smith
Growing older is mandatory. Growing up is optional.
Stay hungry, stay foolish.
Search Forums
Reply With Quote
