the Jamieson ramp onto the QEW is one of the shortest, one of my buddy got into an accident there once
-
Sep 9th, 2009 11:00 AM #1
Merging lanes that are far too short
Does anybody else find short merging lanes to be extreme annoyances along with being safety hazards?
I really don't know what the planners/engineers in charge were thinking when they were building some of these portions of our highways.
Onto specific examples (and interestingly enough, all the examples I can think of are in the same interchange, 401/400/Black Creek, so maybe this in an isolated problem?):
-> Black Creek north-bound exiting to 401 East
-> Black Creek north-bound exiting to 401 West
-> 401 West exiting to Black Creek south-bound
I always get an uneasy feeling anytime I have to drive through there, simply because it's nearly impossible for cars to speed up to 90 - 100 without already being at the very end of the merging lane (not to mention flat-out impossible for trucks), or, in the case of exiting from the 401 West onto Black Creek south-bound, you have very little room to merge, despite having plenty of room to accelerate up to 80.
See picture: http://i32.tinypic.com/246ooja.jpg
Between the red points is a solid line, and that solid line is extremely long. The broken-up line which allows you to merge is placed at the very end (between the green points), giving you less than 2 seconds to merge. On one occasion I had to drive onto the shoulder because a car with a trailer happened to be driving in the adjacent lane and I had the options of either flooring it to try to get ahead of him, or brake and wait to get behind him (which slows down traffic behind me and creates even more problems if there was a car behind the car with the trailer).
With the first two examples I mentioned, it's a trade-off: either speed up to the 100 but find yourself running out of merging space and risk not being able to merge safely, or merge earlier but do so at a slower speed (again, not something you want to do on a highway).
Either I'm missing something or these are all cases of extremely poor planning.
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked umop for this post.
-
Sponsored Links - Join the RedFlagDeals.com community and remove this ad.
-
Sep 9th, 2009 11:04 AM #2
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked rogerrabbit168 for this post.
-
Sep 9th, 2009 11:07 AM #3
The onramp from rathburn onto 427 southbound is a death trap. and even if you merge quickly, you have to move over to the right even quicker to avoid getting off at Burnhamthorpe. I take the longer way to get onto the 427, so i dont have to deal with that onramp, and ignorant drivers.
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked originalnutta for this post.
-
Sep 9th, 2009 11:07 AM #4
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked huskylord for this post.
-
Sep 9th, 2009 11:11 AM #5
Trucks don't get up to 90/100km/h to merge. They barely do 100km/h in teh middle lane! I've seen trucks merging at like 60km/h!
If you can't merge at 100km/h or at least 90km/h get into the lane if there is sufficient space and get up to speed fast. It's do-able._______________Korean girlfriends? Learn to Google? Save money?
What RFD can do for you?
If you drive dangerously I hope you get caught and lose your license/car/dignity!
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked JAGpilot for this post.
-
Sep 9th, 2009 11:27 AM #6
Eastbound Gardiner @ Islington Ave
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked tyfriend for this post.
-
Sep 9th, 2009 11:32 AM #7
Want to see short merging lanes? Come to Montreal and you'll know what I mean.
_______________
FS : DSL Modem, Promise NS4300N NAS, Nokia 7710, PM Me
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked Avatar for this post.
-
Sep 9th, 2009 11:33 AM #8
US highway has this traffic light thing per car for merging, does it help here in Canada?
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked tonychau for this post.
-
Sep 9th, 2009 11:35 AM #9
You should change the subject to - Cars that accelerate far to slow.
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked gherikill for this post.
-
Sep 9th, 2009 11:58 AM #10
What makes this an even bigger issue are drivers in the right lane that can easily move over to the middle, or left lane but don't when they see drivers trying to merge. Even worse are the idiots who drive right beside you. Either speed up or slow down so people can get in saefely.
Even worse is being stuck behind an idiot trying to merge at well below the limit.
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked macalin for this post.
-
Sep 9th, 2009 12:00 PM #11
Start accelerating while on the ramp so you'll be carrying enough speed to change lanes.
I see waaay to many people merging onto the 401 doing like 60, cut across 3 lanes, and then start to accelerate._______________
♠ ES PRODUCTIONS .ca ♠
Professional Photography Services
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked VorteC for this post.
-
Sep 9th, 2009 12:16 PM #12
stop buying stupid land yachts
you wanna see a short "on ramp" - here's one: http://maps.google.ca/maps?f=q&sourc...00239&t=h&z=19
That's one of two major freeways from New York City to Connecticut.
wiki: "The Parkway has two lanes in each direction. Due to its age, it was originally constructed without the merge-lanes, long on-ramps, and long off-ramps that are found on modern limited-access highways. Some entrances have perilously short and/or sharp ramps; some entrances even have stop signs, with no merge lane whatsoever; this leads to some dangerous entrances onto the highway."Last edited by LarryLat; Sep 9th, 2009 at 12:19 PM.
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked LarryLat for this post.
-
Sep 9th, 2009 12:29 PM #13
How about Don Valley Rd on ramp to DVP north? Thats short and blinding.
Solution, buy a faster car :p
Its just a case of old engineering and not enough safety standards. If you ever drive on "US Routes" many of them have a 90 degree merge point and cars are going anywhere from 70-120 km/h
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked GangStarr for this post.
-
Sep 9th, 2009 12:43 PM #14Sr. Member



- Join Date
- Apr 23rd, 2007
- Location
- Toronto
- Posts
- 780
I see these fools do that all the time and worse of all, most use 30-50% of the merge lane. Plenty more room to get up to speed. They are the ones that mess traffic flow. Terrible. :-(
OP, if you think some of our merging lanes are too short, try NYC highways. They basically don't have have. But majority merge properly, use up as much of the merging lane as possible and stomp on gas to merge in safely and most times, don't disrupt traffic flow unlike here. It's sad...
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked johnboy for this post.
-
Sep 9th, 2009 12:53 PM #15
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked ssainani for this post.
Search Forums



