-
Aug 1st, 2012 10:58 AM #16
-
Aug 1st, 2012 11:59 AM #17Permanently Banned
[OP]
- Join Date
- Jun 21st, 2012
- Posts
- 81
-
Aug 1st, 2012 12:05 PM #18
-
Aug 1st, 2012 12:07 PM #19
Current shipping routes to the far east often pass through the Panama Canal, or, ship to Vancouver/California, which then get put on a train and shipped to the East Coast where they get transferred back to ship.
Here's the problem as I see it: in order for the Northwest Passage to make sense to shippers, it needs to save them money, either through levies enforced at the Panama Canal, or fuel savings as a result of a shorter trip. As the largest shipper would be from China, the Panama Canal is far more of a direct passage to Europe and the East Coast. The added fuel costs to go around would likely cost the shippers far more than any potential charge to get through Panama. Look at a map - you can see how, really, this would only benefit shipments from Korea/Russia to the East Coast, Iceland or the UK. That's a relatively small amount of goods, and not a sizable economic goldmine that people expect it to be.
Politically, Northern sovereignty has always been a contentious issue, and the development of a bona fide year-round route would likely cause some headaches with the usual suspects (US, Russia, Norway, Denmark, etc).
Socially, how will this affect the natives of the North that have relied on ice bridges to get from island to island - what will this do to demographics and population?_______________
4chan melts your brain.
-
Aug 1st, 2012 12:08 PM #20Permanently Banned
[OP]
- Join Date
- Jun 21st, 2012
- Posts
- 81
-
Aug 1st, 2012 12:09 PM #21
-
Aug 1st, 2012 12:09 PM #22
-
Aug 1st, 2012 12:13 PM #23
-
Aug 1st, 2012 12:15 PM #24
-
Aug 1st, 2012 12:21 PM #25Permanently Banned
[OP]
- Join Date
- Jun 21st, 2012
- Posts
- 81

Here you see the advantage of the Northern Sea Route, across Russia's northern shore when the ice is clear, as compared to the current Southern Route between Europe and Asia. It allows much shorter passage from Europe to Asia, saving fuel, time and risk. The volume of materiel moving along these routes is unimaginable.
The Northwest Passage, which is more complicated to navigate, does not serve nearly so populous a market, and the distance savings from, say, the NE USA to the West Coast as compared to using the Panama Canal, is not nearly as significant as the Northern Sea Route will be to the folks on the other side of the world.
-
Aug 1st, 2012 12:29 PM #26
Irrelevant. Your discussion is about the Northwest Passage, not the Northern Sea Route. The reason behind the large tonnage on this route is because it serves as an export route for China to Europe. The key here is China. If we open up the Northwest Passage year-round, it doesn't offer a substantive savings.
_______________
4chan melts your brain.
-
Aug 1st, 2012 01:38 PM #27
-
Aug 1st, 2012 01:47 PM #28
NWP can seriously benefit Canada by providing cheaper access to Northern mineral riches. Instead of trucking stuff all the way to Edmonton or Winterpeg (cost of transportation today makes unfeasible any Northern mining but diamond/uranium/etc. operations, with infinitesmall output of very expensive suff), mining companies will be able to load ore and dirt directly on freighters, the way it happens today in Quebec.
-
Aug 1st, 2012 01:54 PM #29
-
Aug 1st, 2012 01:59 PM #30
In b4 dah polical lock.
OP should be banned for political bait lol. Why did the OP report people? The mods aren't stupid, they'll look into it first.
Search Forums

Reply With Quote
