I think the choice of TV comes down to what you plan on using it for (type of content - sports, movies, etc) and your room setup. Also as you mentioned Plasma uses a lot more power than LCDs. Also Plasma can still have a burn-in effect though it's not where near as bad as it was b4.
-
Sep 12th, 2008 05:45 AM #1
Plasma vs LCD [ Sept 2008]
Resurrecting the age old debate, which is better? I know Plasma has gone through some iterations of enhancements. With plasma's we no longer have to worry about BURN-IN's and less life out of the tv. New technologies have allowed plasma to last as long LCD's do. Only downside I see to plasma is that it has higher power consumption and after 60,000 hours you can't replace the inert gases.
PICTURE QUALITY( Plasma Wins)
- plasma technology has the better picture quality in normal to low room lighting conditions and are better in 4 out of 5 picture quality categories. Plasma technology will almost without exception triumph during night time viewing. LCD televisions are great for sunroom/breakfast room type environments
FAST-MOVING VIDEO PLAYBACK( Plasma Wins)
-Plasma displays get the nod here because of their excellent performance with fast-moving images and high contrast levels. There are still some 2nd tier manufacturers whose plasma product displays some phosphor lag, a dragging from brights to darks.
While the "response time" of LCD TVs has markedly improved in the last couple of years, they still suffer from a slight "trailer" effect, where the individual pixels are just slightly out of step with the image on the screen. During fast moving sports scenes, the most discerning eyes can detect this slight motion response lag.Last edited by shawn99; Sep 12th, 2008 at 05:52 AM.
_______________
"Our lives are defined by opportunities. Even the ones we miss."
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked shawn99 for this post.
-
Sponsored Links - Join the RedFlagDeals.com community and remove this ad.
-
Sep 12th, 2008 08:40 AM #2_______________
Silver Bullet VII || SilverStone TJ09 | Corsair AX 850W | Core i7 2600K | Thermalright Venomous X | Asus Maximus IV Extreme B3
eVGA GTX680 SLI | G.Skill Ripjaws X PC3-17066 8GB | Intel 160GB G2 | Samsung F3 1TB in RAID 5 | Pioneer DVR 212D | 3 x 2408WFP
WHS 2011 || Norco 4020 | Corsair AX 750W | SM X9SCL-F | Xeon E3-1220 | 8 x EcoGreen F4 2TB in RAID6 | LSI 9260-4i | Intel RES2SV240 | Intel 80GB G2 | WHS2011
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked Silver Bullet for this post.
-
Sep 12th, 2008 08:41 AM #3
Oh god not this argument again.
People, please just buy what you like and forget about what Magazine X, Forum Poster Y, or Your Buddy Z says.
(Besides, projectors FTW.
)
_______________
ATOT | RFD | YAGT
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked MercenaryForHire for this post.
-
Sep 12th, 2008 08:50 AM #4
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked B0000rt for this post.
-
Sep 12th, 2008 08:53 AM #5Where did you get this from?Only downside I see to plasma is that it has higher power consumption and after 60,000 hours you can't replace the inert gases.
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked fooit for this post.
-
Sep 12th, 2008 08:54 AM #6
My co-worker told me even if you turn off Plasma it still consumes a lot of power.
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked hOrnizuka for this post.
-
Sep 12th, 2008 09:03 AM #7
How much more does the plasma use in power compared to a LCD ?
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked pfbmgd for this post.
-
Sep 12th, 2008 10:16 AM #8
Cnet reviews are good for this aspect. They list power consumption at the end of their reviews. On average, a calibrated plasma will cost you abour $30 more per year in electricity costs. Hmmm is it worth it for the better PQ? For me a no brainer. If you can control the light, plasma FTW.
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked Tennoh for this post.
-
Sep 12th, 2008 11:53 AM #9
Plasmas also have greater viewing angles so are more suited than LCDs for home theatre environments with angled seating.
The same plasma will use more energy when the on-guide programming is employed as it is constantly updating. When on, they make great space heaters for basements, da kuro is warm, lol.
Not everyone here is an AVSer so it's nice for the OP to review the differences. Like reminding people not to buy Monster cables, BOSE, etc...
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked zoolander for this post.
-
Sep 12th, 2008 12:47 PM #10
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked B0000rt for this post.
-
Sep 12th, 2008 01:00 PM #11
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked Tijuana for this post.
-
Sep 12th, 2008 01:12 PM #12
Next year Panasonic and Pioneer will release plasma panels with so called 5-lumen technology inside.
These new panels will be slim, "blacker than black holes", consume about 2 times less electricity and as a trend in electronics they will cost less then today.
Yes, one day we might see OLED LCDs and Laser TVs for sale - the big questions are when, cost and are they really gonna be better than current plasmas and LCDs?
And Laser TV is like 10" deep - no flat, can't hang on a wall.
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked fooit for this post.
-
Sep 12th, 2008 01:13 PM #13
One thing I'm not a big fan of for plasmas is the weight, If I wanted to go 52inch, I would need an extra person everytime I needed to move my t.v. plus it would probably break my t.v. stand.
I also have my t.v. next to a big window, so during the day it gets pretty bright.
And I just don't want burn in at all, not even a chance of it. A friend was telling me he just got a plasma and he has to use this calibration disk everytime there is image retention.. and that just seems like a pain in the ass since I use my t.v. for gaming where there is usually a HUD or something constantly on the screen.
Plus I kind of want to go with sony, and they don't make plasmas.
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked tomthegreat for this post.
-
Sep 12th, 2008 01:25 PM #14
You can get burn in LCDs as well... Just leave your Windows logo, turn off monitor auto off and screen saver - you will get it.
Sony left plasma business because they just couldn't get it right...
In LCDs - I am not sure Sony is the best, IMHO, Samsung and Sharp are better.
What plasma does your friend has? Older plasmas can not be compared with the current generations.
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked fooit for this post.
-
Sep 12th, 2008 01:34 PM #15
The degree to which all displays approximate a sample-and-hold effect:
Best bang for your buck gaming... CRT
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked zoolander for this post.
Search Forums



