First of all, the question is not which company to go with (Sympatico or Rogers), rather, the question should be whether you should go with DSL or Cable for your high-speed.Originally Posted by RDog
The base companies are Sympatico which directly and indirectly sells DSL; and Rogers which directly and indirectly sells cable. What I mean by directly is that these companies will sell you their services directly (i.e. you get billed by Sympatico or Rogers). The term indirectly is that you can buy the service from a re-seller (i.e. Mycybernet, Sprint, 3Web, Primus, etc).
Last year I started off with Sympatico (DSL), later switched over to Rogers (cable), and earlier this year moved to 3Web (cable). And I am very happy with 3Web.
For "simplicity of explanation", DSL is similar to the old Token Ring networks where every port gets the advantage of the full bandwidth, regardless of the network traffic (i.e. number of users on-line). Cable, on the other hand, is similar to an ethernet network. The total bandwidth is shared between the number of users on-line. Essentially, the more users, the slower the connection.
In terms of my own experience, earlier this year I would have recommended DSL over cable to anyone that asked. However, about two months ago Rogers upgraded my area with new switches, lines, etc., and now I get a bit over 4mb/s as my average download speed virtually all the time. Rogers has come a long way.
Consequently, if you live outside a major city, or your area appears to have older cable lines (which is indicative of an older cable infrustructure), go with DSL (Sympatico). On the other hand, if you have newer lines, then I'd recommend cable internet (Rogers).
In my case, I switched over to cable so that I could get my Bell telephone line disconnected and the service replaced with VOIP. Earlier this year DSL was only available over an active Bell telephone line (i.e. you had to have a land line telephone service in order to have DSL internet). Therefore, cable internet was my only option. Today, you can get DSL without a land line telephone service (naked DSL), but in my view, the price is too high ($45/month).
Currently, I use 3Web for my high-speed internet service. 3Web resells Rogers internet for $29/month for 3mb/s - although I average 4mb/s acording to my modem's on-line stats. And, for telephone service, I use VOIP.NET ($19/month US for telephone service).
And, in my view, the setup is great. For about $55/month I get unlimitd high-speed internet, and unlimited telephone service/calls within North America with two phone numbers and every calling feature imaginable.
I hope that the above is one some help.
-
Jul 12th, 2005 11:36 AM #1
Rogers Cable vs. Bell ExpressVu?
I am thinking of moving soon, and am trying to figure out if I should go with Bell ExpressVu or Rogers (Digital) Cable.
Can anyone make mention of the major points for/against either system?
Are there any notable deals going on at the moment I should look at?
Thanks so much,
RDog.
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked RDog for this post.
-
Sponsored Links - Join the RedFlagDeals.com community and remove this ad.
-
Jul 12th, 2005 12:24 PM #2
DSL vs Cable Internet
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked Azenha for this post.
-
Jul 12th, 2005 01:20 PM #3
I do appreciate the lengthy response, but what I was referring to was Television systems, not Internet access. I'm curious to know what the TV options are in a non-bundled capacity so I don't make a decision I regret a month/two months/6 months down the road...
Thanks,
RDog.
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked RDog for this post.
-
Jul 12th, 2005 04:23 PM #4Wow you were totally shooting blanks with that one.
Originally Posted by Azenha
OP, I would do a forum search 'bell expressvu', you'll find more then enough info from past threads. IMHO, ExpressVu is better...bundle up your services and save some money.
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked pakmode for this post.
-
Jul 13th, 2005 12:16 PM #5
Wow... I guess I totally crapped out on the question. Oh well, at least there's some usefull info on internet.
In terms of ExpressVu and Cable - I agree that Expressvu is better. A much cleaner picture, better sound quality, and pricing is much better then cable. Digital cable is trying to compete with Expressvu and it is quite good with comparable features. However, the monthly cost is still on the high end and the receiver pricing is also much higher then Expressvu.
Originally Posted by pakmode
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked Azenha for this post.
-
Jul 13th, 2005 12:37 PM #6
My main complaint with ExpressVu is that when a storm comes around, or if it's very cloudy out, the performance degrades severely. Usually when a thunderstorm hits I'll get artifacts on a screen, until the picture and sound finally quit and I see a "Acquiring Satellite Signal" message until the storm passes.
For quality, ExpressVu; it just has it's limitations when weather conditions interfere._______________
- Absolute
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked Absolute for this post.
-
Jul 13th, 2005 01:13 PM #7Newbie
- Join Date
- Jun 18th, 2005
- Posts
- 39
I got on board the winback promo Rogers was having and traded in my 3100 receiver for their pvr hd receiver (free for two years). No complaints at all. To be perfectly honest, when doing a straight comparision my Rogers bill ends up being about $2 more... but the service is there all the time. Plus many more options on ppv and ROD. Unless Bell is having a similar promotion with their new HDPVR receiver, I am staying with Rogers.
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked acg1978 for this post.
-
Jul 13th, 2005 01:15 PM #8Banned
- Join Date
- Mar 22nd, 2003
- Location
- Here in Toronto
- Posts
- 3,854
I agree that severe weather can and will mostlikely degrade your signal.. but I guess it depends how often you get severe weather storms in your area.
Just being cloudy out doesn't hurt our signal.. but a big storm that is very thick and full of water will wind up blocking the signal. Also, a big winter storm with huge snowflakes falling like crazy will hamper the signal.
All that said, I still would never go back to digital cable. I didn't have Rogers, but Shaw Digital Cable was horrible.
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked v00d00 for this post.
-
Jul 14th, 2005 08:50 AM #9
Thanks for all the great info thus far. I have a question about satellite placement/direction. Is there any particular direction the ExpressVu dish would HAVE to face? For example, if I have a north-facing balcony (or east-facing or any direction in particular) does that matter in terms of having a dish set up?
What about DirecTV or Dish Network - anyone have any recommendations on where to go for that, and approximate cost to purchase and pay monthly (if anything).
Thanks again.
RDog.
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked RDog for this post.
-
Jul 14th, 2005 09:24 AM #10Yes, the sattelite dish must point directly at the sattelite itself, you only have a few milimeters in either direction to play with, to try to aim it. In Ottawa it seems to need to point south-west, so those with a North or East facing balcony can't have ExpressVu, unless they can aim it around a corner balcony.
Originally Posted by RDog
_______________
- Absolute
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked Absolute for this post.
-
Jul 14th, 2005 10:45 AM #11Deal Addict




- Join Date
- May 7th, 2003
- Location
- GTA
- Posts
- 1,398
Check out this article from Digital Home Canada:
http://digitalhomecanada.com/index.p...=234&Itemid=34
One factor that they did not consider is that if you have multiple TV's in your home, you need a separate digital/satellite receiver for each one regardless of which service you choose. However with Rogers, you can at least have analogue service on your other outlets even if you don't have a digital receiver for them. With Expressvu you get no service without a receiver on the TV.Last edited by Jono; Jul 14th, 2005 at 10:48 AM.
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked Jono for this post.
-
Jul 14th, 2005 11:00 AM #12
Well, you don't actually need to have a receiver for each Tv. Bell has several dual tuner receivers available (3200, 5200, 9200) that make it very easy to distribute satellite video to remote TV's and still be able to watch separate channels. In my case, I have a 3200 and 9200 which allows me to watch 4 separate programs on 4 TV's, all in digital quality.
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked supergenius for this post.
-
Jul 14th, 2005 11:23 AM #13Newbie
- Join Date
- Jun 18th, 2005
- Posts
- 39
There is also the cost of the 9200 receiver to consider though.
You can splice a cable countless ways and receive analogue cable through the other jacks in the home.
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked acg1978 for this post.
-
Jul 21st, 2005 10:16 AM #14
For those of you with dual tuners and set-top-boxes, what exactly do you do to control each box separately via remote? By that I mean, if you want to change the channel on one tuner, how do you prevent a second tuner from responding?
Thanks.
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked RDog for this post.
-
Jul 21st, 2005 10:23 AM #15
If you have more than one TV, will Bell ExpressVu still fit the bill?
With digital cable, you can use more than one TV except only one is digital.
Am I right?
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked gman for this post.
Search Forums



