![]()
![]()
Originally Posted by Agent_J
Whew.....that's a load off my electronics arts..![]()
-
Apr 2nd, 2006 03:48 AM #16
While true that you can't make a lot of money in the stockmarket the conventional way with only $200 (through sheer volume of shares) you can double or triple that value with a penny stock if you do a little research. It might actually just be more cost effective to work a little more overtime with the kind of money you will yeild in the most part this way. I know I did last friday and it was only $300-29$ comission X 50% rise in price in 5 hours. It actually interupted my workflow last friday watching that worthless stock actually become something (kept hitting refresh at work while watching over my shoulder as I work in an open cubicle). No stock tips allowed so I am not telling
.
Last edited by BadDrafter; Apr 2nd, 2006 at 03:51 AM.
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked BadDrafter for this post.
-
Apr 2nd, 2006 01:28 PM #17_______________
******************************************8
Everybody Loves Raymond...
I don't
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked alkapone for this post.
-
Apr 3rd, 2006 03:59 PM #18Newbie
- Join Date
- Nov 8th, 2005
- Posts
- 83
alkapone stop hijacking people's threads unless you have something constructive to add.
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked Adi_None for this post.
-
Apr 5th, 2006 03:36 AM #19
At $200 you might consider a mutual fund... It's been a while since I've invested in those, but I think the minimums are usually $100. Other options are GICs and bonds, depending on what risk you're willing to take.
As advice to a new investor, only invest in the stock market what is acceptable to lose! I've had my fair share of losses and gains.
bjl_______________
What we do in life echoes in Eternity... and in Google cache.
HEATWARE feedback, eBay feedback
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked t3359 for this post.
-
Apr 5th, 2006 07:37 AM #20
$200????? gotta be s**ting me!!!! What a laugher! You can't even afford to pay the commissions dude!
Try at least $5K.
Go buy yourself an MP3 player with 2 bills.
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked TigerEROS for this post.
-
Apr 5th, 2006 11:53 AM #21Now...you have hurt my feelings
Originally Posted by Adi_None
_______________
******************************************8
Everybody Loves Raymond...
I don't
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked alkapone for this post.
-
Apr 5th, 2006 12:15 PM #22Yo dude. Take it easy. Everyone starts somewhere.
Originally Posted by TigerEROS
bjl_______________
What we do in life echoes in Eternity... and in Google cache.
HEATWARE feedback, eBay feedback
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked t3359 for this post.
-
Apr 5th, 2006 12:20 PM #23Alright alkapone, I am a fan of your avatar - there, feel better now??
Originally Posted by alkapone
_______________
HEAT
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked smokeylovelove for this post.
-
Apr 5th, 2006 12:40 PM #24Deal Addict




- Join Date
- Mar 23rd, 2005
- Posts
- 2,008
Good attitude. Just think if we all put $200 in Dell, Microsoft, AOL, Berkshire Hathaway, Disney or McDonald's stock back in the day. Twenty years ago, it was common for a parent to buy their newborns one share of Disney stock.
Originally Posted by t3359
Hindsight is 20/20, but many blue chippers will still be around in a few decades with a lot of growth ahead. Buy $200 of a big 5 bank stock, enroll in the dividend reinvestment plan (DRIP) and let it sit until you retire. You're buying shares for $60ish yielding 4%. In twenty years that $60 stock may grow to $600 (pre-split) and still yield 4%. However, that's 4% on $600. Since you only paid $60 for it, you're effectively getting 40% annually.
People who owned their bank stocks one or two decades ago can already claim that kind of dividend yield. People who buy now will be able to say the same sometime between 2019 and 2026. It's a long time to wait... unless your parents bought you a few shares of a favourite company when you were born.
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked sparkplug for this post.
-
Apr 5th, 2006 05:43 PM #25
you don't need $5000 to start some people are just repeating what one person says. yes $200 will not get you any where but you probably need about $2000 or so. just start slow like you can get many stocks around $20 and you buy 100 shares it works out to about $2000 + commission. but you don't have to buy $20 stocks there are lots of good stocks out there that are less like 5,10,15... and anywhere in between. just start off slow and learn the ropes
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked lithiumli for this post.
-
Apr 5th, 2006 07:12 PM #26Sr. Member



- Join Date
- Jan 6th, 2006
- Posts
- 706
well, you certainly need more than 200. The $5000 figure comes from what a lot of the bank brokerages set as a minimum for them to not charge you monthly for service charges on your trading account. It's certainly always a good idea to have an amount that surpasses the minimum just so that fluctuations in market value don't put you below that minimum value.
Originally Posted by lithiumli
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked SamInfinity for this post.
-
Apr 5th, 2006 10:10 PM #27Newbie
- Join Date
- Feb 26th, 2006
- Posts
- 44
Ask close family members if they own any stocks that have a share purchase program. Usually they are fee-free, have no minimum, and the costs of additional share purchases is nil. Ask them to transfer one into your name. Its a bit of paper work involved, but the most likely way to invest starting small. After registering, you can send cheques as little as $50 and purchase fractional shares. Some companies to look into are the big banks and other large cap stocks.
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked mkwong for this post.
Search Forums
