You are clearly biased as you present only the facts that support your argument (regarding bail). I could type a long rebuttal, explaining why he got preferential treatment - but you would not read it, or consider it.Shaner wrote: ↑May 18th, 2017 9:29 pmStating facts is not arguing. The only time I've even shared my opinion is to say that I think he'll be convicted and go to jail. Otherwise, I just state facts, nothing more. Far from enthusiastic, although I find threads about the justice system interesting, far more interesting than threads about how people blow their nose.
As for me being biased, I'd love to know what you're basing that on. I never said he does or doesn't deserve bail, I said he fits the criteria for being granted bail and I even listed the criteria.
To answer the question you posted, not even the first bullet was justified. There was no reason to shoot. BUT it is clear that you disagree with this argument. Which leads me to believe you are in law enforcement. Amiright?