Is the Toyota MR2 making a comeback?

alanbrenton wrote: ↑

Mar 19th, 2017 10:31 am

If we do get a reborn MR2, it might have an engine up front, or at least be a front-mid layout like the 86.

It shouldn't be a front mid layout, otherwise there's almost no point in making the car in the first place, might as well get the 86 which is likely to be cheaper and more useful as a car or revive the 86 roadster. The rear mid layout is frankly the only sensible route to go with an MR2 as Toyota has been the only successful automaker to even remain in that market for so long. Since its more of a statement rather than a profit maker, its got to be a risky car. Either its an even less expensive competitor to the Boxster/Cayman(W10 and W30 route) or it outright defeats the Boxster/Cayman on performance and value(W20 route) which seems more likely. Cayman is $61K, with 300 hp, so its entirely possible to come up with a MR2 that is cheaper and faster than this, is possible with Toyota's resources. Perhaps yet another sourcing of a Subaru flat engine(none of Toyota's current engines looks suitable), preferably a flat six this time since Toyota loves naturally aspirated engines and Subaru probably still needs a new flat 6 for their top of the line cars. That would completely revive the entire 3 Toyota sports car lineup that originally existed during Toyota's glory days in the 1980s where it had every sort of car you want be it off roader, sports car, pickup truck, luxury, whatever.

I'm glad Tetsuya Tada is leading the current Toyota sports car development. He's one of the few top engineers out there that recognizes sports cars shouldn't be purely a spec sheet and that the driving experience is way more important. More importantly he's got the ear of Toyota boss Mr. Toyoda. Since Project 86 did reach the only milestone the company needed to continue on and that's 100,000 in worldwide sales by year 2. I must admit I almost certainly wouldn't be in a new car if Toyota didn't proceed with Project 86.

I spoke to an uncle awhile back who used to track his mx5 and civic in Vancouver and he said back in the 90's, the premium of the mx5 over a civic was just a few grand not like today where the miata rf starts at 38k and a civic si probably 27k.

sandikosh wrote: ↑

Mar 19th, 2017 12:00 pm

Mazda sells a fraction today of what they used to sell in the 90s. Also the current Civic uses a platform that will be shared by other Honda/Acura cars in the future. The new CR-V is based on it and also the next Accord. And since most Acuras are based on the Accord, they all will be using it.

Much like how Toyota is going towards the TNGA platform? Is this for efficiency and cost savings and not reliability?

I'm pretty sure this thing would be the MR2 replacement. Say hello to the Toyota S-FR concept:

dealseaker101 wrote: ↑

Mar 19th, 2017 4:02 pm

I'm pretty sure this thing would be the MR2 replacement. Say hello to the Toyota S-FR concept:

Not even its own mother could love that ugly creation...

dealseaker101 wrote: ↑

Mar 19th, 2017 4:02 pm

I'm pretty sure this thing would be the MR2 replacement. Say hello to the Toyota S-FR concept:

The S-FR is an awesome little car, but I doubt I'd fit in it comfortably. I don't fit in a Miata comfortably.

MR2 should means mid engine, rear wheel drive, 2 seater.

^ Didn't know that.

Ya'll forget about the POS MR-S?