All tuners will leave you some grain and artifacts in the picture, simple because analog cable has its limitations. If this signal isn't high quality, the picture won't be either.
I had a Leadtek 2000XP Expert before, and it was OK. I mean, all the TV Tuners on the market today basically can record video in multiple formats, and some have remotes, too.
I picked a Sapphire Theatrix 550 last month, because it was recommended here on RFD. It is indeed better. The picture quality is free of artifacts, and it's got a nice handy remote. Furthermore, it does all video encoding onboard itself as opposed to the CPU doing it. The Theatrix also has an onboard 16MB of RAM, again not to hog your overall PC experience.
-
Mar 12th, 2006 09:06 AM #1Member


- Join Date
- Sep 19th, 2005
- Location
- Toronto, GTA
- Posts
- 274
which TV Tunner is best?
Hi, i would like to buy a tv tunner, i want very good quality with full screen, which brand and model is good? any suggestion? thx
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked iam_noob3 for this post.
-
Sponsored Links - Join the RedFlagDeals.com community and remove this ad.
-
Mar 12th, 2006 09:08 AM #2_______________
Main: Intel 2600K @ 4.8GHz | Gigabyte P67A-UD7-B3 | 16GB Corsair DDR3-2000 | 2 x 120GB OCZ Vertex 2 in RAID0 | 7 x 2TB WD Caviar Black | 3WARE 9650SE | Antec 1200 | Seasonic M12D 850W | 1.5GB GTX 580 | 2 x 27" Asus VE278Q | Auzentech Prelude | Win7 Pro 64-bit
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked Oversized Rooster for this post.
-
Mar 12th, 2006 09:47 AM #3
Typically the best TV tuner cards use the Conexant chip to render the video image. Hauppauge, arguably the king of tv tuners made it popular and since then other companies have picked it up. Might also want to consider something that does onboard hardware decoding and doesn't pass it off to the cpu - which is probably the real reason why there are such big price differences in this market.
_______________
Innovatively Silent.
My Heatware (68-0-0) is under: Cafe_333
TR-Ultra120@TLF-S12-EW / Accelero S1 / Convection Spreaders
TLF-S12-EW@case / SP-FC70-BL / 5&7V / 120&PSU Vibration Gaskets
UC-A3FATR2-B / S12-430 / Precut Sonata Acoustic Dampeners
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked Cafe_333 for this post.
-
Mar 12th, 2006 10:55 AM #4
Both the ATI 550 chip and the Hauppauge PVR150 - 500 are good choices. I have the Theatrix 550 myself and it's pretty good. I just built an HTPC for my friend using the PVR150 and it's equally good.
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked djspazz for this post.
-
Mar 14th, 2006 11:56 AM #5Sr. Member



- Join Date
- Apr 1st, 2003
- Location
- Unionville, ONT.
- Posts
- 563
I did try ati 550 and leadtek winfast tv xpert(old)/pvr2000(now).
The first one I have is Winfast TV xpert. good quality... but no hdware encode.
Second one.... theatrix 550... better quality, but I really really hate their software.... IMO, their PVR software is suck.
Now, Winfast TV PVR 2000.... quality as good as Winfast Xpert... but it come with hardware MPEG-II encode..._______________
Heatware
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked Boyboy for this post.
-
Mar 14th, 2006 01:07 PM #6
Originally Posted by djspazz
u can't really go wrong with the above
_______________
Lenovo SL400 | Core 2 Duo T9400 | Mushkin 4GB PC2-5300
Phenom II X6 1055T @ 3.5GHz| Asus M4A89GTD PRO/USB3 | 6TB FlexRAID | Dell 2405FPW | flickr
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked ShadowVlican for this post.
Search Forums

