read a blurb in the costco magazine...
they say the emissions are better than gasoline.
looks like the major issues are filtering and logistics of getting the oil
once modified, these diesels can still run regular pump diesel with no ill effect
-
Oct 30th, 2007 06:15 PM #16
Modern high pressure direct injection systems are very sensitive to fuel quality, it would probably be best to get an older IDI engine if you are planning on running WVO for many years.
_______________
The best fuel saving techniques: Beating the EPA - The Why’s and how to Hypermile.
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked seftonm for this post.
-
Nov 1st, 2007 10:53 PM #17
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked nelsonmp5 for this post.
-
Nov 1st, 2007 10:58 PM #18_______________
One more year of tellin' it like it is.
-vaportechYour right space balloons aren't rocket surgery or anything.
My Heatware
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked stealth for this post.
-
Nov 2nd, 2007 06:16 AM #19Deal Fanatic




- Join Date
- Feb 2nd, 2006
- Location
- Burlington/Oakville
- Posts
- 8,400
'Q Will a Greasecar fuel system reduce emissions?
A Yes. There is no sulfur content in vegetable oil which eliminates the first major carcinogen associated with diesel fuel. Vegetable oil plants absorb more carbon dioxide from the air during their growing cycle than is released when the oil is burned, this means that vegetable oil does not produce excess carbon dioxide in the atmosphere (this is referred to as carbon neutral). Due to a slightly cooler burn some studies have shown NOX reductions when burning vegetable oil. More studies are underway and results will vary depending on engine and tuning. As a sulfur free, bio-mass fuel vegetable oil emissions are less harmful to the environment and less toxic to people and animals. '
http://www.greasecar.com/faq.cfm
All WVO vehicles would have the same result as with the Greasecar example.
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked Bullseye for this post.
-
Nov 4th, 2007 12:55 AM #20
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked nelsonmp5 for this post.
-
Nov 4th, 2007 01:55 AM #21
No. He's saying that there's no net output of carbon dioxide if you use biodiesel because the carbon dioxide released from combustion is taken up by the crops when they grow.
Biodiesel won't work. The biological footprint needed to produce it is immense. Also, government subsidies are driving the prices artificially low.
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked raxen for this post.
-
Nov 7th, 2007 09:33 PM #22
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked nelsonmp5 for this post.
-
Nov 10th, 2007 06:32 PM #23
Depends. If you mean growing corn and soybeans, letting the government subsidize these inefficient crops for biodiesel, then yes, there is little hope. Canola is somewhat better.
There is a lot of promising research going on with algae...
US Gal/Acre
corn 18
soybeans 48
canola 127
algae 819
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked PurpleTiger for this post.
Search Forums


