Expired Hot Deals

[Walmart] Bowflex SelectTech 1090 Dumbbell Pair - $419

  • Last Updated:
  • Feb 27th, 2020 2:42 pm
Deal Guru
User avatar
May 9, 2006
11567 posts
2101 upvotes
I ordered. I also did store pick up. If it's just 1, then I can return it on the spot.

I out grew the 552s too quickly.
Newbie
Dec 20, 2017
30 posts
16 upvotes
Came to checkout some weights, stayed to watch some arguing :D
Member
Aug 3, 2014
209 posts
391 upvotes
Scarborough, ON
canuckgameguy wrote: Don't be surprised if it is only a single. The UPC code (708447504777) is most often associated with a single dumbbell as per a quick google search. Also, although the listing says "dumbbells" in the title, no where in there that I can see actually says "pair".
Lmao the single dumbbell retails for like $300 regular price, relax there Sherlock. The listing is for a pair of db's 100%.
Deal Addict
User avatar
Sep 29, 2003
4745 posts
3291 upvotes
Hamilton, ON
skoalman123 wrote: I'll buy 420lbs of cast Iron weights instead.
I have 500lbs in olympic plates, but my bowflex 1090s are used at some point during every one of my workouts. Like right now as I take a break between sets!
Deal Addict
User avatar
Sep 29, 2003
4745 posts
3291 upvotes
Hamilton, ON
canuckgameguy wrote: Don't be surprised if it is only a single. The UPC code (708447504777) is most often associated with a single dumbbell as per a quick google search. Also, although the listing says "dumbbells" in the title, no where in there that I can see actually says "pair".
I paid $198 last year on BF for a pair of these. Its definitely a pair

Edit: I mean $194

Edit 2: if anyone is on the fence, just buy them. They're worth more than this resale and I'm telling you, I use them constantly. Best investment ever.
Images
  • Screenshot_20191123-123753_Samsung Internet.jpg
Banned
Dec 8, 2007
2666 posts
2347 upvotes
aysiphu wrote: Lmao the single dumbbell retails for like $300 regular price, relax there Sherlock. The listing is for a pair of db's 100%.
He didn't believe the TS even though he already got a pair and demanded a pic of them with receipt as proof, so the investigation continues.
Deal Addict
User avatar
Sep 29, 2003
4745 posts
3291 upvotes
Hamilton, ON
cain2589 wrote: Literally googled the 1090s after buying them now at $410 and saw the thread at $194.

I know, no time machine, but damn... I cancelled my order.

I already have the 552s and will add the 1090s If I ever see them sub $300.

https://forums.redflagdeals.com/walmart ... 4-2238095/
Even at this price it's worth it my friend. Sell the other pair in January to offset the cost!
Deal Addict
Aug 24, 2010
2067 posts
1148 upvotes
Toronto
Bought, thanks OP!

Had a $20 voucher on my account, score!
Sr. Member
Feb 20, 2002
971 posts
390 upvotes
Ordered but it stings a bit knowing these were 50% cheaper last year. :( Hoping for a bigger deal come BF.
Member
Jul 5, 2018
277 posts
1001 upvotes
vader_slri wrote: Ordered but it stings a bit knowing these were 50% cheaper last year. :( Hoping for a bigger deal come BF.
Those were almost certainly a price error. Most who ordered it expected it to not be fulfilled. Some got it. Some didn't. For every 5 major price errors you jump on 3-4 will not honor it. Sport chek is ussually the worst for not honoring. A few other examples of those who don't honor:
Lacoste
Barcodes Inc

Walmart has a decent chance of honoring it as long as they have stock.
Lancome gave a free gift to make up for their prior error.

Don't focus on that price as it probably will never come close to that price short of another price error or an in store clearance you luckily notice. Even if you decide a year or two later you want to resell the set used you could probably get $330+ for it. So overall you're in a good position here still.
Sr. Member
Feb 20, 2002
971 posts
390 upvotes
leg3nd wrote: Sold out!
When I ordered, it said “limited quantity” (which pushed me to buy lol). Hopefully they actually ship.
Newbie
Jul 21, 2015
19 posts
13 upvotes
North York, ON
joemers wrote: Hope this go back in stock!
Same here! Shoulda just bought it when I saw it instead of wasting time thinking about it. Classic RFD mistake!

Top