One is cute and can vocalize pain. Lobsters have a pretty sophisticated nervous system apparently.
-
Sep 27th, 2004 07:46 AM #1
What is the difference between...
...roasting a live puppy on a BBQ and steaming a live lobster?
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked mbg for this post.
-
Sponsored Links - Join the RedFlagDeals.com community and remove this ad.
-
Sep 27th, 2004 07:51 AM #2
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked frogger for this post.
-
Sep 27th, 2004 09:17 AM #3Deal Addict




- Join Date
- Sep 5th, 2003
- Location
- Now in Calgary....(SE)
- Posts
- 2,622
I think the meat is tougher when cooked from a live state... it's more tender after slaughter because it starts breaking down.
I saw a documentary once on my ancestors, who were/are cannibals... and they actually scientifically documented that human meat is more tender that way. My grandfather actually had a fork from the natives which was designed for human flesh.
I'm suprised it's not a delicacy yet... people seem to eat anything under the sun nowadays...especially in Asian countries. Don't they cook rats from a live state out in China now??
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked rc51 for this post.
-
Sep 27th, 2004 10:24 AM #4
This is messed up...you're talking about roasting puppies....messed...
EDIT: Wait a minute: is this some sort of vegan propaganda? Respect to those who can survive only eating vegetables, but seriously, accept that eating meat is part of nature for humans, and that its not WRONG to do so.Last edited by danfromwaterloo; Sep 27th, 2004 at 10:27 AM.
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked danfromwaterloo for this post.
-
Sep 27th, 2004 10:26 AM #5
One taste good and the other one has a shell.
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked Immortal for this post.
-
Sep 27th, 2004 10:28 AM #6Deal Guru




- Join Date
- Nov 3rd, 2003
- Location
- Scarborough, ON
- Posts
- 10,389
Originally Posted by danfromwaterloo
That's his point. He's trying to make you think that roasting puppies is just as wrong as steaming lobsters... He's prolly right but I'm anti-vegetarianism... so I disregard these comments.
I believe that plants and fruit also has a life and deserves its chance to live. Therefore I refuse to eat any veggies or fruits unless I absolutely have to for my own survival. If I had the choice between destroying plants for food and having compassion for all living things, I would choose compassion and not kill the plant._______________ITEMS FOR SALE
IBM ThinkCentre Core2Duo SMALL FORM FACTOR | APC 500VA UPS
Cheap cell phones | Micro USB cables
Record in fighting traffic tickets since 2002: 14-2 as of Oct 2011
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked actng for this post.
-
Sep 27th, 2004 10:56 AM #7
roasting a puppy = burning fur and flesh
steaming a lobster = kitchen smells like ocean_______________
Heatware: 40-0-0
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked Fobulous for this post.
-
Sep 27th, 2004 11:50 AM #8
Puppies have big beautiful eyes and can at least be visualised playing with children. Lobsters aren't cute, so therefore we've decided that we can destroy them at will.
_______________
Heatware 50 Positive, 0 Negative
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked deep for this post.
-
Sep 27th, 2004 11:57 AM #9
I imagine the fur on the puppy would complicate matters if you threw one on the grill. Can scientists really know if lobsters feel pain? I'm sure they do.
Besides the point, but boiling lobsters is such a boring way to cook 'em. They'd taste a lot better sauteed, grilled, or baked.
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked Amourek for this post.
-
Sep 27th, 2004 02:03 PM #10guess you didn't see that episode of the simpsons when homers get a lobster.
Originally Posted by deep
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked darth wolf for this post.
-
Sep 27th, 2004 02:13 PM #11I haven't found a place I can go to that will let me pick out a puppy and BBQ it live for me. Lobster you can done all over.
Originally Posted by mbg
Not really much difference. Same kind of thing that some people think eating dog is somehow bad, or "worse" than eating cow.
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked bionicbadger for this post.
-
Sep 28th, 2004 02:13 PM #12
I have found that the puppy is much more difficult to keep on the cooking surface... they tend to try to run off. I guess if you closed the lid that would work alot better, but then it is hard to see if it is burning or not. Plus, cooking live puppies often means that the fur gets all burnt and it leaves a bad taste in the meat. So moral of the story is that lobster is much more tasty and much easier to plunk them into boiling water!
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked mrlarouc for this post.
-
Sep 28th, 2004 02:29 PM #13The burning fur is a big rookie mistake. Amateur!
Originally Posted by mrlarouc
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked warpdrive for this post.
-
Sep 30th, 2004 09:57 PM #14rofl i dont know if anyone else got that lol
Originally Posted by Immortal
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked HughG for this post.
-
Sep 30th, 2004 10:07 PM #15
hope I dont get flamed for that.....
http://www.openknowledge.org/picture...moohoohaha.jpg_______________
For all your mortgage needs in the GTA, contact me. I will not quote rates over email or private messages, so I suggest you contact me and call me to discuss your options. Serious clients only, please.
Reply With Quote
LOG IN TO THANK
No one has yet thanked laptop-tech for this post.
Search Forums


