Defamation I believe is only when the person is clearly lying to damage the reputation of a person/company - if the OP said "they have a sweat shop of 13 year old girls in the basement", then I could see the thread being removed. He was just sharing his experience with a company, I would think free speech applies, considering how often there are similar threads on here complaining about Futureshop or CanadianTire.wilsonlam97 wrote: ↑How could they win in a case when the OP of the previous thread was explaining the truth of his/her experience?
Its only the freedom of speech when it makes sense.
RFD fail.