This is not a game selling crazy graphic, so as long as the game is amazing, I personally don't care when it came out. I think so far there aren't another similar game that surpasses it.
Part of the draw is the portability - Having the ability to play games during downtime such as a commute comes at a premium
Woah, that's actually a nice feature. Damn, should not have click that thread.psincennes wrote: ↑ You can also save your game on PC and continue that saved game on the switch and vice versa, cross-platform cloud saving. Thats why Im thinking of buying the switch version too.
For save game compatibility, you have to have the same expansions/mods/DLC on both though. On the PC you’re probably going to be playing Gathering Storm so unless/until that comes out for the Switch, you wouldn’t be able to continue your PC game. Other way would work if you disable the expansions on the PC.psincennes wrote: ↑ You can also save your game on PC and continue that saved game on the switch and vice versa, cross-platform cloud saving. Thats why Im thinking of buying the switch version too.
Thats what I am doing yes, Im only playing with the base game. No DLCs. No problem with that at all. Love being able to continue my game on the go.cheaper_than_cheap wrote: ↑ For save game compatibility, you have to have the same expansions/mods/DLC on both though. On the PC you’re probably going to be playing Gathering Storm so unless/until that comes out for the Switch, you wouldn’t be able to continue your PC game. Other way would work if you disable the expansions on the PC.
It was in the $15 tier of a Humble Bundle including a dozen other strategy games. Paying more than double for a downgraded worse version of the game on its own seems like an atrocious deal in comparison. Crazy how Nintendo marketing has successfully flipped the concept of downgrading old games to run on worse hardware as a "premium" feature which costs more instead of less like it should
Just because your PC runs Civ6 on recommended settings, doesn't mean every Nintendo Switch users does.ReeGee wrote: ↑ It was in the $15 tier of a Humble Bundle including a dozen other strategy games. Paying more than double for a downgraded worse version of the game on its own seems like an atrocious deal in comparison. Crazy how Nintendo marketing has successfully flipped the concept of downgrading old games to run on worse hardware as a "premium" feature which costs more instead of less like it should
Kevin8se7en wrote: ↑
Just because your PC runs Civ6 on recommended settings, doesn't mean every Nintendo Switch users does.
I entirely understand the appeal of wanting to own old games on Switch. My point is downgrading a game to low-med settings so it's playable on slower hardware is an effort that should cost significantly less instead of more. If more people thought about this logically and voted with their wallets maybe you'd stop seeing ancient games like Skyrim being sold for $80 in 2019
