redflagdealsguy wrote: ↑ Why is the Sabrent Rocket 4 Plus more attractive than the S70 Blade?
It seems the S70 has noticeably faster reads and writes. Writes are way faster on the S70.
Is this an edge case concern or is this the anti-ADATA bandwagon effect? The S70 is also $20 cheaper.
We know ADATA's history, is that the reasoning here?
These are review era drives folks, ADATA is not going to risk nerfing their top shelf NVMe while reviews are still circulating. They'll wait for the product to age out first.
For that reason, I'd actually recommend the S70 over the Sabrent Rock 4 Plus, if the specs are honest.tietherope wrote: ↑ This is largely aimed at the PS5 and lesser drives will not cut it.
https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/ad ... sd-review/
The above review falls short of recommending the drive because of the release date pricing on the 2TB. The aggressively priced 1TB is a great value, at just $10 higher than ATL.
The minimum read performance required by the PS5 is 5500mb/s, but I wouldn't be surprised if that minimum threshold isn't enough for some games during high intensity in-game sequences. So many people are complaining about this situation that I think the XSX made the right move not forcing this gamesmanship on players. That said, if you're in for a PS5, you might as well be in for an affordable 4.0 drive in the S70.
God bless, Gentlemen.
I aim to be inclusive and considerate of others in my posts. If I fall short of that mark, feel free to let me know in good faith, and where appropriate, I'll edit my posts. Thank you.