Seiko Le Grand Sport Men's Two-Tone Kinetic Watch SKA550 - $79.99 USD

This watch looks so dated. I wouldn't wear it even if it's free. I guess it's personal preference.

Dated is a funny thing to say about a watch, not only because it does have A Date display but it makes me wonder when dated becomes antique. Old watches are very popular afterall.

Vintage and dated to me are two different things. Dated design just mean it's out of style. Some vintage watches carry a classic design and are attractive.

Interesting to note though at the recent CES, the smart watch that got the most praise was one tat had a classic (vintage) look. Most reviewers gave the ones that were typical 21st Century look a "meh" at most...

Nice price, i'll consider if my 6 dollar amazon watches are garbage haha

LawEightSix wrote: ↑Nice price, i'll consider if my 6 dollar amazon watches are garbage haha

link please

Avoid this company, fake 5 star reviews with tons of 1 star reviews. They sell USED goods as new:
http://www.resellerratings.com/store/blingdaily

yuprules wrote: ↑Avoid this company, fake 5 star reviews with tons of 1 star reviews. They sell USED goods as new:
http://www.resellerratings.com/store/blingdaily

If you consider buying something from a company called Bling Daily you're basically asking to lose the money.

Also in general, never believe the MSRP on a watch unless it is an extremely limited edition coming from a well-known brand.

golden wrote: ↑This watch looks so dated. I wouldn't wear it even if it's free. I guess it's personal preference.

Agreed. Reminds me of something you'd see in an 80's movie about stock brokers.

Gold two tone watches tend to look tacky, especially those that are gold plated.

warpdrive wrote: ↑Gold two tone watches tend to look tacky, especially those that are gold plated.

I agree. Solid 18K is the best. Go Big or go home. :-)

yuprules wrote: ↑Avoid this company, fake 5 star reviews with tons of 1 star reviews. They sell USED goods as new:
http://www.resellerratings.com/store/blingdaily

Was going to buy, thank you for the link and I will avoid.

gves02 wrote: ↑Was going to buy, thank you for the link and I will avoid.

No problem, the 5 star reviews look fake. No way it can be half 1 star and half 5 star. The 5 star ones have to be fake.

Thanks op, perfect bday gift for my cousin, yes, he has tacky taste.

Available from Amazon.com for $123.25US if you don't want to deal with this sketchy seller.

Does anyone know who their parent company is?

Blingdaily.com, based in Brooklyn, NY, has been doing sales online through our parent company for close to a decade. We hope that you will allow us the opportunity to become your number 1 source for and daily dose of the newest, hottest and trendiest bling on the web. Our promise to you is that we will always be truthful, fair and honest when featuring the Bling Daily product. Customers are the heart and soul of BlingDaily.com, and we strive to provide you with the most enjoyable and hassle free shopping experience on the web.

FunNGlory wrote: ↑Does anyone know who their parent company is?

Blingdaily.com, based in Brooklyn, NY, has been doing sales online through our parent company for close to a decade. We hope that you will allow us the opportunity to become your number 1 source for and daily dose of the newest, hottest and trendiest bling on the web. Our promise to you is that we will always be truthful, fair and honest when featuring the Bling Daily product. Customers are the heart and soul of BlingDaily.com, and we strive to provide you with the most enjoyable and hassle free shopping experience on the web.

The fact that they don't name their parent company should be red flag #1.

golden wrote: ↑This watch looks so dated. I wouldn't wear it even if it's free. I guess it's personal preference.

Yes it is.
The watch looks like to me

golden wrote: ↑This watch looks so dated. I wouldn't wear it even if it's free. I guess it's personal preference.

60 year olds need watches too