Automotive

BMW and VW fined $1Billion for emissions cartel, MB gets indemnity for being whistleblower

  • Last Updated:
  • Jul 8th, 2021 3:52 pm
[OP]
Deal Fanatic
Dec 20, 2018
8206 posts
7588 upvotes

BMW and VW fined $1Billion for emissions cartel, MB gets indemnity for being whistleblower

https://www.reuters.com/business/autos- ... 021-07-08/

Smart of MB to whistleblow on the collusion between the german automakers, BMW spins it that at least they didn't cheat to pass emissions
The European Commission fined German carmakers Volkswagen and BMW a total of 875 million euros ($1 billion) on Thursday for colluding to curb the use of emissions cleaning technology they had developed.

The case, separate to the so-called 'Dieselgate' scandal over software designed to cheat on vehicle emissions tests, sets a precedent by extending the application of European competition law to technical-level talks between industry players.

In this case, talks held a decade ago centred on design standards for AdBlue, an additive used to cleanse nitrogen oxide from the exhaust gases produced by diesel-powered cars.

"This is a first," European Union antitrust chief Margrethe Vestager told a news conference in Brussels. "We have never had a cartel whose purpose was to restrict the use of novel technology."

Under a settlement, Volkswagen (VOWG_p.DE) will pay a fine of 502 million euros and BMW (BMWG.DE) 373 million euros. Daimler, also part of the cartel, was not fined after revealing its existence.

Vestager said the German carmakers, which included VW units Audi (AUDVF.PK) and Porsche (PSHG_p.DE), had possessed the technology to reduce harmful emissions more than required under EU law but avoided competing to do so.

"So today's decision is about how legitimate technical cooperation went wrong. And we do not tolerate it when companies collude," said Vestager.

The EU had narrowed the original scope of its investigation to ensure its charges stuck.

IS TECHNICAL COLLUSION POSSIBLE?

Vestager said that all of the parties had agreed to settle the case and "have acknowledged their role in this cartel".

Volkswagen, however, said it was considering whether to take legal action, saying the penalty over technical talks about emissions technology set a questionable precedent.

"The Commission is entering new judicial territory, because it is treating technical cooperation for the first time as an antitrust violation," Volkswagen said, adding that the fines had been set even though no customers had suffered any harm.

The nub of the carmakers' complaints boil down to whether setting common technical standards amounts to anti-competitive behaviour - or whether indeed it makes it easier for an industry as a whole to embrace new technology.

The Commission said in its 2019 charge sheet that the German carmakers had colluded to restrict the size of AdBlue tanks between 2006 and 2014, thus making the urea-based additive less convenient to use.

BMW noted in its defence that it had been cleared of suspicion of using illegal 'defeat devices' to cheat emissions tests.

"This underlines that there has never been any allegation of unlawful manipulation of emission control systems by the BMW Group," BMW said in a statement.

In the Dieselgate scandal, VW admitted to using such defeat devices, leading to more than 32 billion euros ($38 billion) in vehicle refits, fines and legal costs for the Wolfsburg-based carmaker.
5 replies
Deal Expert
User avatar
Jul 30, 2007
32365 posts
19722 upvotes
Toronto
No difference. They pay the fines and simply add $2-3K to each car (at beginning of new model year) and calls it general increase and in the end, it is the consumers paying it.

Giving fine to any multinationals won't hurt their bottom line at all, well ... not permanent basis as they will recover all that in a couple of years time.
[OP]
Deal Fanatic
Dec 20, 2018
8206 posts
7588 upvotes
booblehead wrote: No difference. They pay the fines and simply add $2-3K to each car (at beginning of new model year) and calls it general increase and in the end, it is the consumers paying it.

Giving fine to any multinationals won't hurt their bottom line at all, well ... not permanent basis as they will recover all that in a couple of years time.
well that's a given that any fines/penalties to companies regardless will be recouped through consumers. But then by this rationale, would MB not increase prices since they don't have to pay the fine? lol

also VW CEO is to pay back $14M to the company for dieselgate.. so it'll be interesting to see if the ceo's will personally have to pay some money to the company for letting this go on ..
Deal Expert
User avatar
Jul 30, 2007
32365 posts
19722 upvotes
Toronto
MB will still dish out their annual price increases and the higher profit margin resulted will then go to the management bonuses. Smiling Face With Open Mouth
Deal Addict
May 16, 2017
2539 posts
3358 upvotes
booblehead wrote: No difference. They pay the fines and simply add $2-3K to each car (at beginning of new model year) and calls it general increase and in the end, it is the consumers paying it.

Giving fine to any multinationals won't hurt their bottom line at all, well ... not permanent basis as they will recover all that in a couple of years time.
In a competitive market no manufacturer "simply" adds to the price without putting themselves at a competitive disadvantage. Even if MB (and everyone else that wasn't fined) also increases prices to match, they benefit from extra revenue, and therefore enhance their ability to re-invest and out-compete in the future against VW and BMW.

Top