Real Estate

Buyer loses $20k deposit ( buyer was an agent)

  • Last Updated:
  • Apr 28th, 2021 11:22 pm
Tags:
[OP]
Deal Fanatic
User avatar
Dec 24, 2002
6840 posts
1537 upvotes

Buyer loses $20k deposit ( buyer was an agent)

Toronto Star: Superior Court lets home sellers keep the $20,000 deposit after the buyers backed away from the signed deal.
https://www.thestar.com/life/homes/2021 ... -deal.html

Interesting article, not sure why the buyer backed out I suspect it had more to do than the sq footage
11 replies
Deal Addict
Jul 3, 2007
4023 posts
4510 upvotes
Toronto
rb wrote: Toronto Star: Superior Court lets home sellers keep the $20,000 deposit after the buyers backed away from the signed deal.
https://www.thestar.com/life/homes/2021 ... -deal.html

Interesting article, not sure why the buyer backed out I suspect it had more to do than the sq footage
lol...even better they are realtors
Deal Addict
User avatar
Mar 30, 2010
3506 posts
1621 upvotes
Greater Toronto Area
joepipe wrote: lol...even better they are realtors
That is the most satisfying part about the story.

Wish they had lost more than just 20k, lol.
RichmondCA wrote: Leading indicator on bear market, when you see this avatar start popping up in this thread
Deal Expert
User avatar
Feb 11, 2009
19281 posts
7755 upvotes
Toronto
I'm aligned with the Judge on this one.

The sellers were definitely being 'scummy' in their representation of the sqft on the MLS Listing, however if they provided floor plans which were accurate with dimensions, as well as actually state how they got to the listing sqft in the marketing brochures that were also provided to the buyer, then the buyers don't really have a leg to stand on.

Especially given the buyer was a Realtor who would/should have the knowledge to do his/her due diligence before making the purchase. IF they couldn't do the DD on their own purchase, should scare you on how they treat their buyers.
Deal Addict
User avatar
Apr 12, 2013
2886 posts
1881 upvotes
Moon
dc200 wrote: That is the most satisfying part about the story.

Wish they had lost more than just 20k, lol.
I am thinking they will have the pay the other parties' legal fees too?

Like others said previously if they cant even review their own purchase, can you imagine what they have/would have done for their client?
Koodo, Public Mobile, Lucky Mobile Customer
[OP]
Deal Fanatic
User avatar
Dec 24, 2002
6840 posts
1537 upvotes
kangarooz wrote: I am thinking they will have the pay the other parties' legal fees too?

Like others said previously if they cant even review their own purchase, can you imagine what they have/would have done for their client?
yep they will have to pay their own and other parties fees .. though this is probably small claims court so there are limits on costs awards to other parties
Deal Fanatic
User avatar
Sep 8, 2007
9225 posts
10753 upvotes
Way Out of GTA
If these buyers are realtors didn’t they consider the damage to any reputation they might have if this became public....like it has. They look like clowns.

“Oh you were the agents that bought without verifying the data and then got salty? Ok see ya later”
Deal Expert
User avatar
Oct 23, 2008
15781 posts
13251 upvotes
GTA, ON
The listing stated that the interior of the dwelling had approximately 2,500-3,000 square feet. The sellers later told the court that the listing gave all realtors access to the home’s photos and details, a marketing brochure, a pre-listing home inspection, and a floor plan of the home with accurate dimensions for each room.

The brochure was also available to purchasers visiting the property and correctly stated the home’s gross, above-grade floor area as 2,155 square feet, plus 665 feet on the lower floor. The brochure stated, “buyer to verify measurements.”
Well, technically the sellers didn't lie. The home is 2155 sqft plus additional basement (665 sqft). The realtor should have done his homework.
Tis banana is IRIE 😎

10% off is cold, 50% off is warm, 75% off is hot, but FREE IS RFD!
Deal Addict
Jan 15, 2010
1489 posts
1814 upvotes
Toronto
Buyer got lucky this was last August and his deposit was so small.
Deal Fanatic
Jul 3, 2011
6517 posts
3781 upvotes
Thornhill
Without providing the actual info I referenced this recently concerning ethics and competence.

The ethics is obvious.

The lack of due diligence incompetence is obvious

The incompetence to accept 1.7% as a deposit on a 1.2 million dollar sale is mindblowing.

Top

Thread Information

There is currently 1 user viewing this thread. (0 members and 1 guest)