Real Estate

Locked: Buying a house for less than its actual value so family member does not lose it

  • Last Updated:
  • Jul 26th, 2019 11:25 pm
[OP]
Deal Guru
Mar 20, 2003
10476 posts
658 upvotes
New-Brunswick

Buying a house for less than its actual value so family member does not lose it

I’m looking for some input on if my plan is sound or if I am missing some law against this or maybe tax consequences.

My wife and I very likely going to have to buy my father in law’s house so that he does not lose it and ends up on the street. He is unable to make the mortgage payments and has 2 maxed out credit lines for about 35000$ plus his bank account is in overdraft every month. I won’t go into the details but there can be no question of giving him charity as he is mentally incapable of understanding money or finances. Bear in mind this is after we provided him with an itemized budget that would allow him to break even but he has done absolutely none of it (e.g. 28$ a month for a newspaper subscription) and congratulated himself on a job well done.

Back to the house, the goal is that we purchase his house at the remaining value on the mortgage and we pay all the fees. Then we allow him to live in it rent free until he dies or goes into a nursing home except he has to cover all the bills minus the insurance which we would cover.

My main question is are we even allowed to offer the mortgage value? This amount is about 50% below market value of the house but as I said he will be saving the mortgage cost every month and we won’t be collecting any rent. The risk is that he is only 67 and could remain there for many years but considering he is about 150 lbs overweight and has un-managed diabetes the odds are stacked against him.

To do this I would get a HELOC on which I would pay the minimum every month until such a time as he is no longer in the house. At this point it would either sold as-is or renovated significantly and sold for profit.

Does this make sense or am I missing something? I’m concerned about something like his having to go in a nursing home- would the government try to take money form us for this or look at his own income only? Bear in mind he has basically no income and his wife is also in a nursing home already.

Of course if he rejects our offer then I don't know... he's hinted he wants the mortgage and credit line for it but if that was the case then I'd have to charge him rent but the odds of seeing any of that money would be slim to none.

****

And just so there is no 'OMG, you are a terrible greedy monster and deserve to die' comments- we can NOT give him any money. This is a man who is tens of thousands in debt and then proudly tells my wife how he spent 150$ on printer ink so he can print kijiji ads about buying an accessible van (with what money??????????) so he can 'bust' his non-mobile wife out of the nursing home.
Last edited by Feneant on Jul 29th, 2019 6:22 am, edited 1 time in total.
30 replies
Deal Fanatic
Jan 15, 2017
6145 posts
6684 upvotes
Ottawa
Has your father in law created a Power of Attorney for Property and Personal Care? The one big red flag, imo, in your post is you state the your father in law is mentally incapable of understanding money or finances. This is an alarming statement as your father in law may not have the capacity to enter into any purchase agreement regarding the home and without a legal Power of Attorney for Property, you may not be able to move forward.

My suggestion at this point is to seek legal advice regarding your issues and concerns.
Deal Addict
Feb 19, 2019
2600 posts
4625 upvotes
GTA
skeet50 wrote: Has your father in law created a Power of Attorney for Property and Personal Care? The one big red flag, imo, in your post is you state the your father in law is mentally incapable of understanding money or finances. This is an alarming statement as your father in law may not have the capacity to enter into any purchase agreement regarding the home and without a legal Power of Attorney for Property, you may not be able to move forward.

My suggestion at this point is to seek legal advice regarding your issues and concerns.
This was my initial thought, but after reading the original post again I am not sure if OP means the father in law is mentally incapable or simply terrible with finances.
Full Time and Full Service Realtor
Deal Expert
May 30, 2005
49333 posts
10691 upvotes
Richmond Hill
Have you thought about capital gains when you sell at market value? Since your purchase price is 50% lower you will be responsible for the capital gains as it is not your primary residence
Tons of things for sale!
Silver Coins and Numismatics | Heatware
Deal Addict
May 23, 2017
1358 posts
1348 upvotes
I may be wrong, but I believe since it's between family you can just go to a lawyer and transfer the title directly from your FIL to you and your wife's name? (You don't need to actually complete a "buy/sell" transaction and no realtors are needed.) The house will be "deemed" to be sold at market value (you may want to pay for an appraisal to be done at time of transfer). You will also need to go to the bank of course to do the mortgage transfer (there may be fees involved and you & your wife will need to qualify for the mortgage through the bank).

Of course this is assuming your FIL is on board with it--he may refuse because he's basically giving up his rights to the house and may risk being kicked out by you...perhaps you can draft up a long-term lease for $1/month rent to keep him at ease?

I definitely second the opinion to talk to a lawyer though--they will be able to suggest the best (fastest/cheapest) way to proceed while ensuring everything is done properly. You will need the lawyer anyways to complete the transaction, no matter how you decide to go about it.
Sr. Member
Oct 2, 2017
918 posts
688 upvotes
if he's mentally incapable I would be hesitant to do something like this. He could just turn around and claim you defrauded him.
I'll see you at the top, cause the bottom is too crowded
[OP]
Deal Guru
Mar 20, 2003
10476 posts
658 upvotes
New-Brunswick
It would be interesting to have him tested (can they do that?) to see if he is mentally incapable. I use the term more as senasena states because he does not understand finances but now you all have me worried because I could absolutely see him claiming we defrauded him.

Some example why I say he is incapable- remember that he is tens of thousand in debt:
He gave away a trailer worth a few thousands
He has a non-working boat parked on his lawn and refusing to sell it even though people are asking
He pays over 300$ a month in internet/tv/phone bills and refuses to change it
He has a life insurance policy when his wife is in a nursing home and his children are grown so no one needs that money
He purchased a new 2000$ lawn tractor on his credit line because his lawn mower broke, for a lawn that's about 10000 square feet.
etc.

This is why we can't just give him money as he would buy a tiger repelling rock (Do you see any tigers around? It works!).

jk9088, I will look into that as it may be a possibility.
Member
Mar 7, 2011
418 posts
130 upvotes
Toronto
jk9088 wrote: I may be wrong, but I believe since it's between family you can just go to a lawyer and transfer the title directly from your FIL to you and your wife's name? (You don't need to actually complete a "buy/sell" transaction and no realtors are needed.) The house will be "deemed" to be sold at market value (you may want to pay for an appraisal to be done at time of transfer). You will also need to go to the bank of course to do the mortgage transfer (there may be fees involved and you & your wife will need to qualify for the mortgage through the bank).

Of course this is assuming your FIL is on board with it--he may refuse because he's basically giving up his rights to the house and may risk being kicked out by you...perhaps you can draft up a long-term lease for $1/month rent to keep him at ease?

I definitely second the opinion to talk to a lawyer though--they will be able to suggest the best (fastest/cheapest) way to proceed while ensuring everything is done properly. You will need the lawyer anyways to complete the transaction, no matter how you decide to go about it.
this is probably the quickest way. Lawyers can tell you more, but this is essentially a gift (Canada has no gift tax). You still need to pay land transfer tax on the mortgaged amount.

As another person said, you will trigger a gain if your future selling price is above the transferred price (net of costs and etc).

About your concern about government - you would worry about it if this property is not your father-in-law's primary residence.
Member
Mar 7, 2011
418 posts
130 upvotes
Toronto
jujojoh wrote: this is probably the quickest way. Lawyers can tell you more, but this is essentially a gift (Canada has no gift tax). You still need to pay land transfer tax on the mortgaged amount.

As another person said, you will trigger a gain if your future selling price is above the transferred price (net of costs and etc).

About your concern about government - you would worry about it if this property is not your father-in-law's primary residence.
also like to add - bit more complicated but whatever you do, do not buy at below the market value (there's way to structure it so you can get around paying the actual market value). Your cost basis would be at your purchased price, which would mean that you will get a nasty capital gains tax (as it would not be your primary residence)
Deal Addict
May 23, 2017
1358 posts
1348 upvotes
^ Yup, definitely a concern. Which is why I suggested getting an appraisal done at the time of transfer, so you can show exactly what the market value was at the time of "purchase". Do not use the amount your FIL has left on the mortgage or even his purchase price (both likely way lower than the current market value). By getting an appraisal for the highest possible value right now, you can minimize future taxes.

And yes, definitely talk to the lawyer about how to make sure everything is kosher so your FIL cannot claim he got defrauded in the future.
Member
Mar 26, 2012
461 posts
365 upvotes
Feneant wrote: I’m looking for some input on if my plan is sound or if I am missing some law against this or maybe tax consequences.

My wife and I very likely going to have to buy my father in law’s house so that he does not lose it and ends up on the street. .........

My main question is are we even allowed to offer the mortgage value? This amount is about 50% below market value of the house but as I said he will be saving the mortgage cost every month and we won’t be collecting any rent. ......
Yes, you can buy your FIL's house at his mortgage value if he agrees to it. But, if you already have a principal residence already, your cost base for capital gain purpose is the mortgage value you pay.

Although that is not what you are asking, your FIL might be better off financially by selling his house in the market at fair market value, as he can extract the remaining 50% equity of his house that you are not paying. I am surprised that you or his daughter have not suggested this financially better option to him.
Last edited by fkungery on Jul 24th, 2019 3:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Deal Addict
Jun 7, 2017
1043 posts
842 upvotes
BC
I wouldn't touch that. Let him manage his own affairs.
Member
Mar 26, 2012
461 posts
365 upvotes
jk9088 wrote: ^ Yup, definitely a concern. Which is why I suggested getting an appraisal done at the time of transfer, so you can show exactly what the market value was at the time of "purchase". Do not use the amount your FIL has left on the mortgage or even his purchase price (both likely way lower than the current market value). By getting an appraisal for the highest possible value right now, you can minimize future taxes.
It is a related party transaction. I do not think that an appraisal report for the market value will help, because (a) it is a principal residence to the FIL, and tax exempt, and (b) the buyer (OP) 's cost base is the mortgage value he pays, not the appraised market value of FIL's house.
Deal Fanatic
Jan 15, 2017
6145 posts
6684 upvotes
Ottawa
Feneant wrote:
He has a life insurance policy when his wife is in a nursing home and his children are grown so no one needs that money
...
You write children, so I assume that your wife has siblings. This changes everything as they will need to be in agreement with any actions that you take. Do not do anything without their written agreement as it’s all bets are off when you are altering family assets and future inheritances.
Deal Addict
User avatar
Jan 2, 2012
4634 posts
3208 upvotes
Toronto
fkungery wrote: Although that is not what you are asking, your FIL might be better off financially by selling his house at fair market value, as he can extract the remaining 50% equity of his house that you are not paying. I am surprised that you or his daughter have not suggested this financially better option to him.
I think the problem is that he would just end up wasting away any of the equity he got in cash.

Feneant wrote: My wife and I very likely going to have to buy my father in law’s house so that he does not lose it and ends up on the street. He is unable to make the mortgage payments and has 2 maxed out credit lines for about 35000$ plus his bank account is in overdraft every month. I won’t go into the details but there can be no question of giving him charity as he is mentally incapable of understanding money or finances. Bear in mind this is after we provided him with an itemized budget that would allow him to break even but he has done absolutely none of it (e.g. 28$ a month for a newspaper subscription) and congratulated himself on a job well done.
Does he work now? How exactly is he paying mortgage every month and at least minimum payments on the loans? Does he have the financial capacity to eventually pay off the loans? Even if he did have the capacity, without the mentality to stick to a budget he will never pay them off and eventually they will default and go to collections.

Even if you can somehow put the house entirely into your name, I assume you won't be paying off his loans for him. He should perhaps looks at a consumer proposal/bankruptcy to resolve all his debts. This would at least cut off the availability of credit for him in the near future, making him only buy stuff he can pay for upfront.
Deal Addict
May 23, 2017
1358 posts
1348 upvotes
fkungery wrote: It is a related party transaction. I do not think that an appraisal report for the market value will help, because (a) it is a principal residence to the FIL, and tax exempt, and (b) the buyer (OP) 's cost base is the mortgage value he pays, not the appraised market value of FIL's house.
Not an "official" source so definitely consult a lawyer first, but according to this: https://www.moneysense.ca/save/taxes/tr ... ids-for-1/

...it says: "Generally, when you transfer a capital asset between family members, who are not dealing with each other at arm’s length, the transfer is deemed to take place at market value for capital gains tax purposes."

So I assume an appraisal can be used to determine what current market value is. According to that article there may also be a way to structure it so that no land transfer taxes need to be paid. However, I assume there are a lot of complicating factors depending on the specific situation so OP should definitely talk to a lawyer (as well as perhaps an accountant) to see how best he should structure this to minimize tax implications and fees.

Also, the situation will definitely be more complicated if the FIL is not actually on board with basically "gifting" the house to his daughter + SIL in exchange for them taking over the mortgage and letting him live there rent-free.
Deal Fanatic
Jul 3, 2011
6517 posts
3808 upvotes
Thornhill
Have you considered just being the mortgagee, where, instead of buying it, it becomes a refinance through you where you them a mortgage in the amount of the balance owned and register it as a first charge?

You should speak with a tax or family planning lawyer for structuring same to ensure it is a mortgage and not construed by the CRA as a part share purchase which would also would attract land transfer fees and inheritance issues particularly in terms of Inheritance.
[OP]
Deal Guru
Mar 20, 2003
10476 posts
658 upvotes
New-Brunswick
Ok so this is a lot more confusing than I expected and if he is willing to consider it we'll first need to sit down with a lawyer. If we can buy it for the cost of the mortgage but transfer it at its appraised value that is great but I'm not too worried about capital gains. This is more to help him than as an investment but I expect if we put in 50-60k in renovations at a later time we'd be able to sell for about 80-100k more than we paid. Renovations while he is living there is not an option as he does not clean and he has a dog that has chewed every baseboard, curtains, screens, furniture items in the house so it's losing value every day he spends there.

For the other questions he retired due to disability with 0 savings and significant debt, he does have another daughter but she is (wisely perhaps...) estranged, and we did consider having him sell the house but can't get him to understand that whatever capital gains he makes should be for debt where he instead says he would buy a more expensive house- but yet end up in a better financial position.
Deal Fanatic
Nov 22, 2015
8571 posts
10488 upvotes
Feneant wrote: Ok so this is a lot more confusing than I expected and if he is willing to consider it we'll first need to sit down with a lawyer. If we can buy it for the cost of the mortgage but transfer it at its appraised value that is great but I'm not too worried about capital gains. This is more to help him than as an investment but I expect if we put in 50-60k in renovations at a later time we'd be able to sell for about 80-100k more than we paid. Renovations while he is living there is not an option as he does not clean and he has a dog that has chewed every baseboard, curtains, screens, furniture items in the house so it's losing value every day he spends there.

For the other questions he retired due to disability with 0 savings and significant debt, he does have another daughter but she is (wisely perhaps...) estranged, and we did consider having him sell the house but can't get him to understand that whatever capital gains he makes should be for debt where he instead says he would buy a more expensive house- but yet end up in a better financial position.
To be clear, you should be looking at transfering ownership of the house and assuming the remainder of the mortgage - not "buying" the house at the mortgage value.

You should be worried about capital gains... If you buy the house at below market value, it's a big mistake that can cost you thousands of dollars.
Deal Fanatic
Jan 15, 2017
6145 posts
6684 upvotes
Ottawa
Feneant wrote: ...

For the other questions he retired due to disability with 0 savings and significant debt, he does have another daughter but she is (wisely perhaps...) estranged, and we did consider having him sell the house but can't get him to understand that whatever capital gains he makes should be for debt where he instead says he would buy a more expensive house- but yet end up in a better financial position.
Being estranged now does not eliminate his other daughter to future inheritances and her making future claims against the estate and any changes that you may make now. Actually, her being out of the picture now would be a huge red flag for me to not buy the house and to be very cautious regarding the financial affairs and any future impacts that this may have on the estate.

When you meet with your lawyer, make sure you discuss this estranged daughter and the impact that this may have on your options.

Top

Topic Information

There is currently 1 user viewing this thread. (0 members and 1 guest)