Renters would love that I bet... they sure are competing with each other for all the non "hobby-landlord" units in corporate managed apartment rentals.
Purpose built apartments rent for cheaper than newer condos with more amenities? Color me shocked.krn905 wrote: ↑ Renters would love that I bet... they sure are competing with each other for all the non "hobby-landlord" units in corporate managed apartment rentals.
oh wait, those are all the undesired places to live and rent for cheaper than comparable private owned dwellings in the same areas.
lol
I see old ass condos with no amenities go for more than the apartments that are purpose built, yes, even new ones.
Show me an example of comparable places in comparable locations with materially different rental prices.krn905 wrote: ↑ I see old ass condos with no amenities go for more than the apartments that are purpose built, yes, even new ones.
Metcap and the like are really shitty to live under, and often because of concentration this tends to be a cluster of similar apartments instead of mixed within varied developments. Plenty of old condos along king that people prefer to the renovated apartments just beside them in Parkdale, ect..
I personally prefer renting under a corporate landlord, but most people I find have a dislike for it as at some point they heard a Hororr story about X management company. Metcap is a good example as they control alot here.
There is currently 1 user viewing this thread. (0 members and 1 guest)
