Score breakdown ×
I don't think Valve will ever be worried while Epic can't compete in regions that don't have credit/debit cards as their main online form of transaction. A big part of the whole EGS vs Steam on how much publishers make per game argument was that Steam provides regional pricing and payment methods where EGS can't because their cut is too low (eg. on the one extreme end I believe it's in India where Steam offers the option of physical payment for games).
I think 6 have a lot of improvements that the gameplay is not too uniform. Science victory usually means parking all great scientists on your territory and burst them at the end. In civ 6 every great people is so different. The policy cards are way more dynamic than the policy tree in civ 5, which i admit I usually pretty much go for the same ones even I pursue for different victories.RaidZero wrote: ↑ That's exactly how much this game is worth. 1, 2 were amazing, 3 and 4 very good, 5 good as well after patches, 6 is more of the same without real improvements (phalanxes can still kill a tank if you have enough of them).
Plus it's 4 years old. Who is really interested in TBS and did not read enough reviews (guilty as charged, your honour) got it long ago.
