Sorry, this offer has expired. Set up a deal alert and get notified of future deals like this. Add a Deal Alert

Expired Hot Deals

Sorry, this offer has expired.
Set up a deal alert and get notified of future deals like this.
Set up a Deal Alert
Amazon.ca

The Fifth Element 4K Ultra HD/Bluray/Ultraviolet $14.99

  • Last Updated:
  • Feb 11th, 2021 12:58 pm
25 replies
Newbie
Feb 6, 2017
7 posts
9 upvotes
who cares about 4k for a movie this old.....
Deal Addict
User avatar
Nov 13, 2014
1343 posts
1767 upvotes
Westmount, QC
james50a wrote: who cares about 4k for a movie this old.....
The 4k transfer looks better than the bluray but PQ is not the only reason to buy a 4k Bluray. An ATMOS track is always welcome.
Deal Addict
Feb 13, 2005
1595 posts
1455 upvotes
Damn I want the vhs

Looks like there are several more 4K marked down to $15
Deal Addict
Nov 22, 2003
3728 posts
2056 upvotes
james50a wrote: who cares about 4k for a movie this old.....
Ignorant comment. It's older movies shot on film that actually benefit from 4K unlike the pretend upconverted junk you probably think is awesome. Take Kubrick's 2001 for instance - this could be scanned at 8K and you'd still have more detail to extract fun the original film. Educate yourself and stop posting until you do.
Last edited by txenglan on Feb 5th, 2021 11:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Deal Guru
User avatar
Jan 8, 2006
11172 posts
6087 upvotes
Ontario
For those wondering,

Its on Netflix, 1080p though
Deal Fanatic
Apr 30, 2003
7800 posts
1611 upvotes
Toronto
It's always floating around the $15 mark.

If you want the better 4k encode.,get the. Uk version. It's a far better 4k encoding as this one is based on the older first 4k release since 2017.
Deal Addict
Dec 27, 2012
2588 posts
2192 upvotes
Canada
PCDawg wrote: It's always floating around the $15 mark.

If you want the better 4k encode.,get the. Uk version. It's a far better 4k encoding as this one is based on the older first 4k release since 2017.
Apparently this is based on the 4K Blu-ray remaster adding HDR highlights... am I wrong?
Sr. Member
Nov 17, 2013
979 posts
196 upvotes
WINNIPEG
Most older movies shot on film contain enough detail to transfer to true 4k really well. Most if not all of the MCU movies Are shot 2-3k and upscaled but not 100% sure. Either way don't think you can tell the diff. Lots of good and bad transfers both ways.

https://4kmedia.org/real-or-fake-4k/
james50a wrote: who cares about 4k for a movie this old.....
Deal Addict
Sep 9, 2015
1591 posts
1202 upvotes
Nanaimo
Must own disc for fans. I'm waiting for Leon to dip down below $15.

I noticed that black hawk down and close encounters are also $15 right now. I ordered CE.
Member
User avatar
Dec 18, 2017
240 posts
137 upvotes
GVA
Thanks - one of my favourite movies. 84GB file available on Usenet for those so inclined.
Newbie
Dec 24, 2018
17 posts
9 upvotes
Bought this last year, the image quality is great and the movie is still worth it for sure
Deal Fanatic
Nov 27, 2011
5829 posts
5454 upvotes
Calgary
txenglan wrote: Ignorant comment. It's older movies shot on film that actually benefit from 4K unlike the pretend upconverted junk you probably think is awesome. Take Kubrick's 2001 for instance - this could be scanned at 8K and you'd still have more detail to extract fun the original film. Educate yourself and stop posting until you do.
Old movies on film also tend to have a lot of grain. And usually the CGI doesn't hold up like Men In Black, for instance
teksavvy sucks
Banned
Dec 1, 2020
862 posts
344 upvotes
Moderators lick khun…
james50a wrote: who cares about 4k for a movie this old.....
You might be surprised what old school film...scoff...can pick up in terms of resolution. The mighty 35mm film.
Deal Expert
Feb 24, 2018
26923 posts
36768 upvotes
Cinematic film used for numerous decades can be digitized into a clean 8K copy, or an edge-case 16K copy. Both 8K and 16K will require modern editing and refinement to clean up artifacts and correct for legacy film weaknesses. Beyond 16K, last I researched this topic, there's nothing but noise in the film. That's not to say that modern techniques couldn't produce amazing upscales at 32K, but that's pure speculation.

In 5 to 10 years, I can see studios scanning their original film at these mega-resolutions, and then archiving the original film for the indefinite future. At retina PPI with reasonable distances, 16K / 32K allows you to animate the side of buildings with visually flawless content.

Check this out, we're getting better at further enhancing dirty lower resolution sources.


Check out this video from 1899 colorized and enhanced with sophisticated modern techniques (both audio and video):
https://redditsave.com/info?url=/r/Damn ... 99_little/

The above was possible because film, almost since inception, provided resolutions that exceeded modern digital video and photography until 10 or 15 years ago (if you ignore less common or highly specialized commercial applications).

It's a fortunate gift from the past that film technology may immortalize old content in very high resolution for current and future generations.
I aim to be inclusive and considerate of others in my posts. If I fall short of that mark, feel free to let me know in good faith, and where appropriate, I'll edit my posts. Thank you.
Deal Guru
Jan 25, 2007
12675 posts
7842 upvotes
Paris
Special place in my heart for this DVD as it was the first one I ever saw.

Top