Pretty unfair to compare Federer from 28 to 37 when all the others are 5 to 6 years younger (other than Wawrinka).Unresphek wrote: ↑ Here is something else for you fednatics to chew on.
There once upon a time when maestro was mirking everyone on tour unless they're nadal and novak.
It is so sad for your goat looking at this picture during this decade. 23 of 42 titles or over 50% won playing against killers on the atp250 and atp500
*fednatics: it was all about winning GS! Nothing else matter except the GS! IT'S ALL ABOUT WINNING GS damn it 🤬🤬!!!
Well what do you think at the picture below?
*tennis fans : we acknowledge facts
*fednatics : We only know excuses
That 10 or so GS your goat won in the previous decade must have been through battles against other goat candidates amirite? It couldnt have been against some journeymen could it? NO! NO! NO! I refuse to believe so!
@OntEdTchr how do you like them apples ive put forth before you? Not bad for some casual fan right? These facts go well with the salt you've harvested this decade.
Novak's peak was/is higher than Federer, but TMF's longevity and peak is sustained longer.
Nadal is a brute force and the King of Clay. No one comes close.
The GOAT debate will never be solved. Let's wait until they all retire and then we can compare.
I remember watching tennis in the mid 2000s and boy, was watching Federer a joy. 14 years later, he's still bringing it at a ripe old age of 38 and counting. Simply unbelievable.
It's really that simple.