Dyson Refurbished vacuums from $139
- Deal Link:
- https://shop.openbox.ca/dyson/vacuums/
- Retailer:
- Openbox
tempted to get the dyson v10 (v10b is absolute apparently) for $399
Aug 15th, 2019 1:10 pm
Aug 15th, 2019 1:16 pm
Aug 15th, 2019 1:28 pm
Pros and cons for bagless vs bagged?CaptainSnake wrote: ↑ Bagless vacuums are very bad compared to bagged ones.
I cannot in good conscious recommend a Dyson bagless vacuum or stand-by while people consider buying them.
Don't expect to do any heavy duty work with these.
Aug 15th, 2019 1:29 pm
damn i was gonna buy a v6 for the shop..CaptainSnake wrote: ↑ Bagless vacuums are very bad compared to bagged ones.
I cannot in good conscious recommend a Dyson bagless vacuum or stand-by while people consider buying them.
Don't expect to do any heavy duty work with these.
Aug 15th, 2019 1:31 pm
That's curious. I don't like Dyson's since mine have been nothing but trouble (small ball + x3 Stick ones). But I'm curious why you dislike bagless units so much? Ive never owned a bagged vacuum from my central vac to shop shop vac?CaptainSnake wrote: ↑Bagless vacuums are very bad compared to bagged ones.
I cannot in good conscious recommend a Dyson bagless vacuum or stand-by while people consider buying them.
Don't expect to do any heavy duty work with these.
Aug 15th, 2019 1:36 pm
They do have a small canister (the handheld ones) but are only good as an expensive dust buster replacement (I do own one, of the small handheld models from an ebay deal at $100 back when they had the 20% off coupons, it's good for small messes but not much else) I do like the ball vacuum and find it's fantastic for everything else but I wouldn't use it as a shop vac.CaptainSnake wrote: ↑ Bagless vacuums are very bad compared to bagged ones.
I cannot in good conscious recommend a Dyson bagless vacuum or stand-by while people consider buying them.
Don't expect to do any heavy duty work with these.
Aug 15th, 2019 1:38 pm
I've used Dysons for 10 years, and I haven't found anything else that is such a pleasure to use. There is nothing else I would rather use.CaptainSnake wrote: ↑ Bagless vacuums are very bad compared to bagged ones.
I cannot in good conscious recommend a Dyson bagless vacuum or stand-by while people consider buying them.
Don't expect to do any heavy duty work with these.
Aug 15th, 2019 1:38 pm
I got a bagged one after reading this:theflyingsquirrel wrote: ↑ Pros and cons for bagless vs bagged?
Aug 15th, 2019 1:39 pm
Aug 15th, 2019 1:48 pm
Aug 15th, 2019 1:58 pm
Aug 15th, 2019 2:06 pm
Dyson vacuums are great for regular home use, so efficient the filter almost never needs cleaning, and great suction.CaptainSnake wrote: ↑ Bagless vacuums are very bad compared to bagged ones.
I cannot in good conscious recommend a Dyson bagless vacuum or stand-by while people consider buying them.
Don't expect to do any heavy duty work with these.
Aug 15th, 2019 2:20 pm
While this is true, if all things equal bagged is always going to be superior to bagless. For handheld vacuum you are never going to get a bagged one. Dyson still made the best handheld vacuum as far as I know.CaptainSnake wrote: ↑ Bagless vacuums are very bad compared to bagged ones.
I cannot in good conscious recommend a Dyson bagless vacuum or stand-by while people consider buying them.
Don't expect to do any heavy duty work with these.
Bagless Protheflyingsquirrel wrote: ↑ Pros and cons for bagless vs bagged?
Central Vac to Shop Vac still has a huge filter. They are able to be efficiency without a bag because of their massive size to allow the air flow to do the job. (Still not as good as bagged mind you) but in a compact vacuum they don't have such space to allow that without a bag.User131439 wrote: ↑ That's curious. I don't like Dyson's since mine have been nothing but trouble (small ball + x3 Stick ones). But I'm curious why you dislike bagless units so much? Ive never owned a bagged vacuum from my central vac to shop shop vac?
Dyson works *fine* for their purpose. Vacuuming non-carpet places. Or people who are not picky about quality (like when they don't have allergy issue, etc)escape1975 wrote: ↑ Dyson vacuums are great for regular home use, so efficient the filter almost never needs cleaning, and great suction.
I'm guessing most people won't use a Dyson when they're doing construction work cleanup, or they should not like you said but I would not call them bad ...
Most certainly not me. I tried both. Couldn't imagine dealing with Dyson. Miele are *more* expensive than Dyson. By the way. If someone prefer Miele there's no way they dislike Dyson because of price.Most people who say that have never tried a Dyson and because of the price they're haters![]()
Aug 15th, 2019 3:54 pm
Q: This openbox website doesn’t do shipping to Ontario?
Aug 15th, 2019 4:02 pm
1: That's an extreme exaggeration. There are bad bagless vacuums that leak lots of dust back into the room, but there are also very good ones with HEPA filtration and very good sealing. And there are bad bagged vacuums as well as good ones.CaptainSnake wrote: ↑ Bagless vacuums are very bad compared to bagged ones.
I cannot in good conscious recommend a Dyson bagless vacuum or stand-by while people consider buying them.
Don't expect to do any heavy duty work with these.
Aug 15th, 2019 4:02 pm
Aug 15th, 2019 4:04 pm
Aug 15th, 2019 4:12 pm
Repo600 wrote: ↑ I got a bagged one after reading this:
https://amp.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/ ... th_a_very/
OK, so repair technicians prefer bagged to bagless. They also prefer top-load washing machines to front-load for the same reasons: simpler mechanisms means fewer repairs. It's an obvious preference from the viewpoint of someone who has to work on them. The fact remains that front-load washers wash better and wear/damage clothing and bedding less. As a consumer, I'm much more concerned with the care and longevity of my clothing and bedding than with having a slightly lower chance of having a washing machine repair bill. And I'm more interested in the convenience of a bagless vacuum, and in not having to buy bags, and in not adding needless bags to landfill, than in having a slightly lower chance of having to repair my vacuum cleaner. And my refurbished Dyson has been going strong for about seven years now, with the only issue being the battery losing its charge too fast now because it's that old. So my next vacuum cleaner will be a plug-in bagless, either a Dyson or a Shark.CaptainSnake wrote: ↑ I'm not an expert on vacuums but there was a reddit AMA of someone who was.
You can find it here: https://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/ ... _ive_lost/
Aug 15th, 2019 4:22 pm
Someone will have to do the math on the carbon footprint of a broken vacuum vs paper bags.OakAged wrote: ↑ OK, so repair technicians prefer bagged to bagless. They also prefer top-load washing machines to front-load for the same reasons: simpler mechanisms means fewer repairs. It's an obvious preference from the viewpoint of someone who has to work on them. The fact remains that front-load washers wash better and wear/damage clothing and bedding less. As a consumer, I'm much more concerned with the care and longevity of my clothing and bedding than with having a slightly lower chance of having a washing machine repair bill. And I'm more interested in the convenience of a bagless vacuum, and in not having to buy bags, and in not adding needless bags to landfill, than in having a slightly lower chance of having to repair my vacuum cleaner. And my refurbished Dyson has been going strong for about seven years now, with the only issue being the battery losing its charge too fast now because it's that old. So my next vacuum cleaner will be a plug-in bagless, either a Dyson or a Shark.
Aug 15th, 2019 4:23 pm
There is currently 1 user viewing this thread. (0 members and 1 guest)