You think driving away from an infraction absolves you from responsibility? Give your head a shake.....is that what you want to believe? The officer will swear he drove away. And he will say correct. Guilty. Even if he
I'm sure you didn't quote me on purpose, lol.fordmaple wrote: ↑ You think driving away from an infraction absolves you from responsibility? Give your head a shake.....is that what you want to believe? The officer will swear you drove away. And you will say correct. Guilty. Even if you lie, the officer has the benefit of the doubt you drove away. Good luck....but is that parking ticket worth your time? Don't pay it......see if you'll be able to renew your license. Did you think you unlocked some trick that hasn't ever been addressed?
C'mon
LOLOL no kidding. This is one of the funniest ones in a while...LMAO
Therefore I'm clearly not guilty of this offence."
OP is in BC. Ontarios highway traffic act isn’t enforceable there.trixstar wrote: ↑ Your ticket will be dismissed. Let the court know that according to Section 3.1 (b) of the HTA
“Infractions must be hand delivered and placed neatly under the wiper blade of the offending vehicle in order for the ticket to be valid by the ticketing officer”
Case closed. You can thank me later
LOL guessing this was satire or an attempt to see if OP would actually go to court and cite thistrixstar wrote: ↑ Your ticket will be dismissed. Let the court know that according to Section 3.1 (b) of the HTA
“Infractions must be hand delivered and placed neatly under the wiper blade of the offending vehicle in order for the ticket to be valid by the ticketing officer”
Case closed. You can thank me later
S.3 of the HTA has to do with the Registrar of Motor Vehicles (a person/position) and their duties and stuff, not parking infractions. Also such wording appears absolutely nowhere in any section of the HTA.
trixstar wrote: ↑ Your ticket will be dismissed. Let the court know that according to Section 3.1 (b) of the HTA
“Infractions must be hand delivered and placed neatly under the wiper blade of the offending vehicle in order for the ticket to be valid by the ticketing officer”
Case closed. You can thank me later
???Delegation of powers, etc., to Deputy Minister and Registrar
(3) The Minister may authorize the Deputy Minister and the Registrar or either of them to exercise and discharge in his or her place any of the powers conferred or the duties imposed upon him or her under this Act or the regulations and, where both the Deputy Minister and the Registrar are so authorized, either of them may exercise and discharge any of the powers and duties. R.S.O. 1990, c. H.8, s. 3 (3).
You are off the hook on this one. You just have to make sure to attend the court date and read out what you posted. You can thank me laterGrayson M wrote: ↑Thanks for all the useless responses to this. Just to let all of you know.
From the BC Community Charter Section 266 (3) (b) https://www.bclaws.gov.bc.ca/civix/docu ... section266 :
Laying information and serving ticket
266 (1)When laying an information by means of a ticket, a bylaw enforcement officer must indicate on the ticket the offence charged and must sign the ticket.
(2)The bylaw enforcement officer must serve the ticket on the person alleged to have contravened the bylaw.
(3)Service of a ticket under subsection (2) may be effected by
(a)serving a copy of the ticket on the person alleged to have contravened the bylaw immediately after the alleged contravention, or
(b)causing a copy of the ticket to be served in the same manner as a summons may be served under the Offence Act.
(4)Service of a ticket under subsection (2) may be proved by
(a)the oral evidence given under oath of the person who served it, or
(b)the certificate of the person who served the ticket, if the certificate is endorsed on the ticket or a copy of the ticket.
(5)The certificate referred to in subsection (4) is proof of the facts stated in the certificate and of the authority of the person who signed it without further proof of the person's appointment or signature.
And before you get cheeky and say... Oh but what is the Offense Act say:
Service on individual
28 (1)Subject to subsection (3), a summons must be served by a peace officer or enforcement officer, who must deliver it personally to the person to whom it is directed, or, if that person cannot conveniently be found, must leave it for the person at the person's last or usual residence with an occupant of it who appears to be at least 16 years of age.
(2)For the purposes of the service of a summons in respect of an alleged offence under a bylaw of a municipality, a peace officer includes a bylaw enforcement officer appointed under section 36 of the Police Act.
(3)A summons in respect of an alleged offence under a bylaw of a municipality or regional district may be served in the manner set out in subsection (1) by a person appointed for that purpose by the council of the municipality or the board of the regional district.
(4)For the purposes of this section, a person appointed under subsection (3) has the legal status of a peace officer.
So I guess I am off the hook for this as I was not served the ticket in any manner.
There is currently 1 user viewing this thread. (0 members and 1 guest)
