Cell Phones

Why go Port-less? Advantages? Simply a money grab...

  • Last Updated:
  • Dec 11th, 2020 10:58 pm
Tags:
[OP]
Deal Expert
User avatar
Jan 27, 2006
19585 posts
3238 upvotes
Woodbridge

Why go Port-less? Advantages? Simply a money grab...

We all know it's coming. It's been rumoured for a year now and we basically got a teaser with the iPhone 12, sort of by releasing MagSafe "wireless" charger. Another way to make even more money.

IMO it goes back to their (last I heard) $8 Billion in sales with beats/AirPods. I get there are cheaper alternatives but all you have to do is look around, how many are rocking AirPods (and Apple Watches) with their iPhones. Does Apple even still sell those Lightning Cable EarPods?

If this isn't the case, why make the next iPhone (13) port-less?

I always say, it's business but sometimes it's too much. It's not like they are giving out MagSafe Chargers for those who pre-order like how Samsung does with their flagships. I still have my free Fast Wireless Charger from Samsung.
"I'll put up color bars before I'll put you in front of our cameras."

- MacKenzie
THE NEWSROOM (HBO)
25 replies
Deal Addict
Nov 30, 2016
1542 posts
2137 upvotes
Waterloo Region
Convince folks this is what they need, and if needed, tell them that it's good for the environment, then make a ton of money.
Deal Expert
User avatar
Mar 25, 2003
17009 posts
5499 upvotes
Markham
port-less for better waterproof
48TB Node 304 / i5-3570 / Server 2016 Essentials
12TB HP Mediasmart EX 495 (E8400, 3.0GHZ, 4GB Mushkin), with Server 2016 Essentials
16TB Qnap TS-459 Pro
Deal Fanatic
User avatar
Sep 10, 2005
5548 posts
3397 upvotes
GTA
Nothing stops iPhone users from using other bluetooth headphones or Qi compatible chargers. It's the same deal with not including a charger. Any USB-C charger will work.

On the other hand, ditching the lightning port means losing out on all the lightning related royalties.
Deal Addict
Jan 13, 2014
2865 posts
1856 upvotes
Calgary
Still curious how you’ll do a DFU restore without a cable. Unless there ends up being some kind of data connection with Magsafe next year, it might be tricky.

But yes, it really is about money, and Apple knows their customers will gladly fork out whatever they need to. They’ve gotten away with it with the headphones, they’re getting away with it for the charger now, and I don’t see things changing unless people actually did stop buying iPhones.

Also, before anyone says it, I fell right into their trap this year........
Images
  • 0B7D9300-E350-44BF-BEE0-3086DE703C76.jpeg
Deal Addict
Jul 21, 2009
1586 posts
1237 upvotes
Toronto
Create a problem and charge your consumers for the solution. Its the Apple way !
Deal Fanatic
User avatar
Nov 14, 2003
6265 posts
4877 upvotes
LaLaLand
No ports is a bad idea in my opinion. In addition to DFU, what happens if the wireless charger or induction coil in the phone fails?

One less port also means less accessories to buy and that is bad for sales. Face With Tears Of Joy
Deal Addict
Jan 13, 2014
2865 posts
1856 upvotes
Calgary
batcave wrote: No ports is a bad idea in my opinion. In addition to DFU, what happens if the wireless charger or induction coil in the phone fails?

One less port also means less accessories to buy and that is bad for sales. Face With Tears Of Joy
Well, the same argument goes for what if the charging port fails- which I’d think would be more likely with cables being plugged and unplugged from them every day.
Deal Expert
Aug 2, 2004
37301 posts
10536 upvotes
East Gwillimbury
Wireless charging is not as efficient as wired. That alone puts me off.

Wired charging at worse is 50% efficient, at best 80%. You lose the rest to heat

Wireless charging is probably closer to 30% efficient and 60% best case. Electricity cost the same in both cases. Why would I pay more in electricity to use wireless charging?
Deal Addict
Jan 13, 2014
2865 posts
1856 upvotes
Calgary
Like you’re going to notice a difference in your electricity bill by going with wired charging vs wireless......
Deal Fanatic
User avatar
Nov 14, 2003
6265 posts
4877 upvotes
LaLaLand
Devhux wrote:
Well, the same argument goes for what if the charging port fails- which I’d think would be more likely with cables being plugged and unplugged from them every day.
It is very unlikely that both charging port and wireless induction coil fail at the same time.

There is also a speed difference in charging. If I need to change faster, I will plug in the cable to the phone. Overnight is fine charging wirelessly. Having both options is a good thing.
Banned
Aug 11, 2018
996 posts
928 upvotes
Keigotw wrote: port-less for better waterproof
yes, but seems kinda silly. the phone is already pretty water resistant. an electronic will never be fully waterproof. seals degrade over time.

i'd rather they increase the thickness (more battery) and leave the port. whether it's lightning or USB-C, i dont care, but portless is stupid in my eyes
[OP]
Deal Expert
User avatar
Jan 27, 2006
19585 posts
3238 upvotes
Woodbridge
Exactly.

The only time I really took advantage of the IP rating was to show it off. That was a few years ago when it first came out.

Like their environmental BS argument removing the chargers.
"I'll put up color bars before I'll put you in front of our cameras."

- MacKenzie
THE NEWSROOM (HBO)
Deal Addict
Dec 22, 2007
1581 posts
1191 upvotes
Mississauga
bembol wrote: Exactly.

The only time I really took advantage of the IP rating was to show it off. That was a few years ago when it first came out.

Like their environmental BS argument removing the chargers.
I do wonder how many people used the included charge and headphones. I don't think I ever used any of the headphones and stopped using the chargers as got those usb power hubs. Would be nice if they did something like heres the phone with headphones/charger and a discount without it.
Sr. Member
Dec 15, 2017
659 posts
727 upvotes
Vancouver
I bought the iPhone 12 last week but made a point of not getting any new accessories (except a case).
Going to continue using my old chargers and headphones for the immediate future. Like mentioned earlier, the accessory money grabs are getting pretty ridiculous. That's why I like the ports for now.
Currently: Fido Black Friday: 30GB/$30 - LTE (includes 10GB bonus)
Previously: Telus EPP: 20GB/$50 - 5G
"Retail is for suckers" - Cosmo Kramer
[OP]
Deal Expert
User avatar
Jan 27, 2006
19585 posts
3238 upvotes
Woodbridge
Personally, I prefer my Samsung Fast Wireless Charger over this MagSafe.

This the beauty of having two flagships, even if Apple does go through with this portless nonsense I have options. Unless of course, Samsung follows suit.
"I'll put up color bars before I'll put you in front of our cameras."

- MacKenzie
THE NEWSROOM (HBO)
Deal Expert
User avatar
Mar 25, 2003
17009 posts
5499 upvotes
Markham
48TB Node 304 / i5-3570 / Server 2016 Essentials
12TB HP Mediasmart EX 495 (E8400, 3.0GHZ, 4GB Mushkin), with Server 2016 Essentials
16TB Qnap TS-459 Pro
Deal Expert
User avatar
Oct 9, 2003
17986 posts
956 upvotes
I'd be all for this if the wireless chargers were as ubitqous as the usb c chargers are now. I literally only use the port for charging so any way to get rid of it would be good by me.

That being said, I'm still waiting for the day that cellphones can sit in cradles and have full desktop capabilities. So, kinda hypocritical.
[OP]
Deal Expert
User avatar
Jan 27, 2006
19585 posts
3238 upvotes
Woodbridge
This is my point not everyone wants to use the "Cloud" or stream but I guess I'm in a minority that I use the port to transfer my music and videos.

This is what Apple wants, forces you into.

Like I said hopefully Samsung keeps the microSD for a long time.
"I'll put up color bars before I'll put you in front of our cameras."

- MacKenzie
THE NEWSROOM (HBO)

Top

Thread Information

There is currently 1 user viewing this thread. (0 members and 1 guest)