Why would anyone go for the "M2-L" / "M condition L" license instead of a full M2 / M license?
There doesn't seem to be much of a difference in requirements in getting either license, ie. It's not easier or faster to get an M2-L / M condition L license, so why would anyone limit themselves to that?
The only reason i could think of is that if you only ever have access to a vespa type vehicle and never want to get on a regular motorcycle (even just for the road test), then M2-L / M condition L allows you to go through the whole process without ever touching a regular motorcycle, correct? (if i understand correctly, you can do both road tests on your vespa type vehicle for the m2-l / m condition L, but m2 and M require full motorcycle even if just for the road tests?)
Also, say you only want to ride a vespa type vehicle, but you want full m2/m license, you still have to do both road tests on a full motorcycle, right?
The only reason i could think of is that if you only ever have access to a vespa type vehicle and never want to get on a regular motorcycle (even just for the road test), then M2-L / M condition L allows you to go through the whole process without ever touching a regular motorcycle, correct? (if i understand correctly, you can do both road tests on your vespa type vehicle for the m2-l / m condition L, but m2 and M require full motorcycle even if just for the road tests?)
Also, say you only want to ride a vespa type vehicle, but you want full m2/m license, you still have to do both road tests on a full motorcycle, right?